Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high-volume center retrospective propensity score matching study

被引:13
作者
Jia, Zhuoyu [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Shougen [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zequn [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Junjian [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Yuqi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Jianfei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Gan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xingqi [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qingrui [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yanbing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Prov Key Lab Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
gastric cancer; laparoscopic gastrectomy; long-term survival; robotic gastrectomy; EXAMINED LYMPH-NODES; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGERY; ESOPHAGOJEJUNOSTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; DISSECTION; RECOVERY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.5785
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG).Methods: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared.Results: After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 +/- 68.77 vs. 89.89 & PLUSMN; 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 +/- 12.44 vs. 29.83 +/- 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 +/- 4.18 vs. 10.33 +/- 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) >= 25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three-year overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) were observed.Conclusions: Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short-term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long-term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner.
引用
收藏
页码:10485 / 10498
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Outcomes of Non-Operative Treatment for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer [J].
Ali, Bandar Idrees ;
Park, Cho Hyun ;
Song, Kyo Young .
JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2016, 16 (01) :28-33
[2]   The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging [J].
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Greene, Frederick L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. ;
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. ;
Brookland, Robert K. ;
Meyer, Laura ;
Gress, Donna M. ;
Byrd, David R. ;
Winchester, David P. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) :93-99
[3]   Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer [J].
Anderson, Casandra ;
Ellenhorn, Joshua ;
Hellan, Minia ;
Pigazzi, Alessio .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (09) :1662-1666
[4]   Surgical Outcomes, Technical Performance, and Surgery Burden of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer A Prospective Study [J].
Chen, Qi-Yue ;
Zhong, Qing ;
Liu, Zhi-Yu ;
Li, Ping ;
Wang, Jia-Bin ;
Lin, Jian-Xian ;
Lu, Jun ;
Cao, Long-Long ;
Lin, Mi ;
Tu, Ru-Hong ;
Huang, Ze-Ning ;
Lin, Ju-Li ;
Zheng, Hua-Long ;
Lin, Guang-Tan ;
Zheng, Chao-Hui ;
Huang, Chang-Ming ;
Xie, Jian-Wei .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 276 (05) :E434-E443
[5]   Trends in clinical outcomes and long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single high-volume center experience of consecutive 2000 patients [J].
Choi, Seohee ;
Song, Jeong Ho ;
Lee, Sejin ;
Cho, Minah ;
Kim, Yoo Min ;
Kim, Hyoung-Il ;
Hyung, Woo Jin .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2022, 25 (01) :275-286
[6]   Surgical Merits of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy Techniques with D2 Lymphadenectomy in Obese Patients with Gastric Cancer [J].
Choi, Seohee ;
Song, Jeong Ho ;
Lee, Sejin ;
Cho, Minah ;
Kim, Yoo Min ;
Hyung, Woo Jin ;
Kim, Hyoung-Il .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) :7051-7060
[7]   Human factors and cardiac surgery: A multicenter study [J].
de Leval, MR ;
Carthey, J ;
Wright, DJ ;
Farewell, VT ;
Reason, JT .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 119 (04) :661-670
[8]   Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer [J].
Degiuli, M. ;
Sasako, M. ;
Ponti, A. ;
Vendrame, A. ;
Tomatis, M. ;
Mazza, C. ;
Borasi, A. ;
Capussotti, L. ;
Fronda, G. ;
Morino, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (02) :23-31
[9]  
Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI [10.17116/hirurgia2018090162, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae]
[10]   Technical Performance as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery [J].
Fecso, Andras B. ;
Bhatti, Junaid A. ;
Stotland, Peter K. ;
Quereshy, Fayez A. ;
Grantcharov, Teodor P. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (01) :115-120