Predicting radiation therapy outcome of pituitary gland in head and neck cancer using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and radiobiological models

被引:0
|
作者
Shahbazi, S. [1 ,2 ]
Ferdosi, R. [3 ]
Malekzadeh, R. [2 ]
Zamiri, R. Egdam [4 ]
Mesbahi, A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Mol Med Res Ctr, Inst Biomed, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Fac Management & Med Informat, Dept Hlth Informat Technol, Tabriz, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Shahid Madani Hosp, Med Sch, Radiat Oncol Dept, Tabriz, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2023年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
NTCP; radiobiological model; ANN; pituitary gland; radiotherapy; NORMAL TISSUE; CRANIAL RADIOTHERAPY; BRAIN; DYSFUNCTION; OPTIMIZATION; ORGANS; RISK;
D O I
10.52547/ijrr.21.1.7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Pituitary dysfunction is one of the complications associated with head and neck radiation therapy. Here, radiobiological and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to estimate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the pituitary gland. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one adult patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and brain tumor were studied. Two radiobiological models of Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB), log-logistic, and ANN were employed to calculate the NTCP of the pituitary gland for all patients. BIOPLAN and MATLAB softwares were used for all calculations. The necessary parameters for each radiobiological model were calculated using Bayesian methods. R2 (coefficient of determination) and root-meansquare error (RMSE) parameters were used for the ANN method to get the best estimate. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to compare the models. Results: The respective mean NTCPs for nasopharyngeal patients with LKB and log-logistic models were 54.53% and 50.83%. For brain tumors, these values were 62.23% for LKB and 53.55% for log-logistic. Furthermore, AIC and AUC values for LKB were 77.1 and 0.826 and for log-logistic were 71.9 and 0.902, respectively. AUC value for ANN was 0.92. Conclusions: It can be deduced that LKB and log-logistic methods make reliable estimations for NTCP of the pituitary gland after radiotherapy. Moreover, the ANN approach as a novel method for NTCP calculations performed better than the two conventional analytical models as its estimations were much closer to the clinical data.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of Pituitary Gland Complications by LKB and LogLogistic Radiobiological Models in 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Tumors
    Shahbazi S.
    Jangjoo A.G.
    Zamiri R.E.
    Motlagh B.N.
    Mohammadzadeh M.
    Okutan M.
    Mesbahi A.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2021, 18 (03) : 203 - 210
  • [2] Artificial neural network-assisted prediction of radiobiological indices in head and neck cancer
    Ahmed, Saad Bin Saeed
    Naeem, Shahzaib
    Khan, Agha Muhammad Hammad
    Qureshi, Bilal Mazhar
    Hussain, Amjad
    Aydogan, Bulent
    Muhammad, Wazir
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [3] Evaluation of the Radiobiological Models Predicting the Radiation-Induced Hypothyroidism in the Partially Irradiated Thyroid Gland of Patients with Breast Cancer
    Imani, Atusa
    Mesbahi, Asghar
    Jafari-Koshki, Tohid
    Zamiri, Reza Eghdam
    Motlagh, Behnam Nasiri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [4] Analysis of causal models of diet for patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy
    Ogama, Norimasa
    Suzuki, Sumie
    Yasui, Yoko
    Azenishi, Katumi
    Shimizu, Yasuko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 (04) : 291 - 298
  • [5] Nomogram for Predicting Symptom Severity during Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Sheu, Tommy
    Fuller, Clifton David
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Morrison, William H.
    Beadle, Beth M.
    Phan, Jack
    Frank, Steven J.
    Hanna, Ehab Y.
    Lu, Charles
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 151 (04) : 619 - 626
  • [6] Compliance to radiation therapy of head and neck cancer patients and impact on treatment outcome
    Ferreira, B. C.
    Sa-Couto, P.
    Lopes, M. C.
    Khouri, L.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 (07) : 677 - 684
  • [7] Outcome prediction for prostate cancer detection rate with artificial neural network (ANN) in daily routine
    Ecke, Thorsten H.
    Bartel, Peter
    Hallmann, Steffen
    Koch, Stefan
    Ruttloff, Juergen
    Cammann, Henning
    Lein, Michael
    Schrader, Mark
    Miller, Kurt
    Stephan, Carsten
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [8] Changes in the Submandibular Gland in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Radiation Therapy: A Preliminary Study
    Uchiyama, Yuka
    Kreiborg, Sven
    Murakami, Shumei
    Tsujimoto, Tomomi
    Sumida, Iori
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (06) : 3239 - 3242
  • [9] Paraganglioma of the head and neck region, treated with radiation therapy, a Rare Cancer Network study
    Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin
    Ozyar, Enis
    Alanyali, Senem
    Poortmans, Philip
    van Houtte, Paul
    Sohawon, Schoeb
    Esassolak, Mustafa
    Krengli, Marco
    Villa, Salvador
    Miller, Robert
    Demiroz, Candan
    Akyurek, Serap
    Aggerholm-Pedersen, Ninna
    Thariat, Juliette
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (06): : 1770 - 1776
  • [10] The Prediction of Cardiac Events Using Contemporary Risk Prediction Models after Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Alvi, Raza M.
    Quinaglia, Thiago
    Spahillari, Aferdita
    Suero-Abreu, Giselle A.
    Hassan, Malek Z. O.
    Gongora, Carlos
    Gilman, Hannah K.
    Nikolaidou, Sofia
    Sama, Supraja
    Wirth, Lori J.
    Chan, Annie W.
    Addison, Daniel
    Neilan, Tomas G.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)