Preferred Terminology of People With Serious Mental Illness

被引:7
作者
Mizock, Lauren [1 ]
Dilts, Gregory [1 ]
Sotilleo, Erica [1 ]
Cherry, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Fielding Grad Univ, Sch Psychol, Clin Psychol PhD Program, 3610 Sacramento St, San Francisco, CA 94116 USA
关键词
mental illness; qualitative; recovery; preferred terminology; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; HEALTH-SERVICES; TERMS; LANGUAGE; LABELS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; DISABILITY; CONSUMER; USERS;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000717
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
People with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) have argued for name changes for their conditions given problems with oversimplification, stigma, and social exclusion. There is a need to better understand the terminology preferences of people with SMI. The present two-part qualitative study analyzed data regarding participant preferences and evaluations of different labels for SMIs using qualitative data analysis methodologies of grounded theory and content analysis. The range of names identified by people with SMI in the present qualitative interviews and the positive and negative evaluations of the different labels are presented. Results were integrated across Study 1 and Study 2 to identify the following preferred and nonpreferred terms for these mental health problems; mental illness, diagnosis, disorder, psychiatric disability, person in recovery, person with lived experience, mental health challenges/issues, chemical imbalance, symptom names, and self-constructed labels. These results suggest the need to identify and reflect the terminology preferences of each individual with mental health problems when seeking psychological services and recognize the varying benefits of different terms depending on time and context. Impact Statement This study identifies terminology preferences for people with serious mental illness, an underserved group, and helps clarify best practices for providers of psychological services and investigating and reflecting terminology preferences for this population to reduce stigma, and promote recovery-oriented care practices in supporting their self-determination and empowerment.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 197
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE PRACTICE OF PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION - HISTORICAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND RESEARCH BASE [J].
ANTHONY, WA ;
LIBERMAN, RP .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1986, 12 (04) :542-559
[2]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[3]  
Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis
[4]   Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale [J].
Corrigan, PW ;
Salzer, M ;
Ralph, RO ;
Sangster, Y ;
Keck, L .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (04) :1035-1041
[5]   What's in a name? Terms preferred by service recipients [J].
Covell, Nancy H. ;
McCorkle, Brian H. ;
Weissman, Ellen M. ;
Summerfelt, Tom ;
Essock, Susan M. .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (05) :443-447
[6]  
Cutler, 2020, RECONCILING DISABILI
[7]   A systematic review of the terms used to refer to people who use mental health services: User perspectives [J].
Dickens, Geoff ;
Picchioni, Marco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 58 (02) :115-122
[8]   Patient, Client, Consumer, or Service User? An Empirical Investigation Into the Impact of Labels on Stigmatizing Attitudes [J].
Fischer, Melanie W. ;
Johnson-Kwochka, Annalee V. ;
Firmin, Ruth L. ;
Sheehan, Lindsay ;
Corrigan, Patrick W. ;
Salyers, Michelle P. .
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2020, 43 (03) :197-204
[9]   Mental Illness, Problem, Disorder, Distress: Does Terminology Matter When Measuring Stigma? [J].
Fox, Annie B. ;
Vogt, Dawne ;
Boyd, Jennifer E. ;
Earnshaw, Valerie A. ;
Janio, Emily A. ;
Davis, Katelyn ;
Eikey, Elizabeth, V ;
Schneider, Margaret ;
Schueller, Stephen M. ;
Stadnick, Nicole A. ;
Zheng, Kai ;
Mukamel, Dana B. ;
Sorkin, Dara H. .
STIGMA AND HEALTH, 2021, 6 (04) :419-429
[10]  
Geertz C., 1974, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Science, V28, P26, DOI [DOI 10.2307/3822971, 10.2307/3822971]