A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: Identifying current practices and avenues for improvement

被引:59
作者
Howard, Matt C. [1 ,2 ]
Henderson, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Alabama, Mitchell Coll Business, Mobile, AL USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Mitchell Coll Business, 5811 USA Dr S,Rm 337, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
关键词
COMMON METHOD BIAS; SAMPLE-SIZE; PSYCHOLOGY; VARIANCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; TUTORIAL; VALIDITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113328
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We perform a literature review of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in six premier tourism and hospitality journals to (1) identify best practices, (2) ensure that researchers apply these best practices, and (3) enable future authors to be more precise in their reporting of EFA. Our results identify that researchers (1) frequently obtain large sample sizes and perform data quality checks, (2) overwhelmingly prefer the principal component approach rather than the common factor approach, (3) are reliant on varimax and other orthogonal rotations, (4) utilize the Kaiser criterion rather than more supported approaches, (5) produce large primary and sec-ondary loadings, and (6) have never identified concerning common method variance via Harman's one-factor test. We urge researchers to utilize oblique rotations and supported factor retention approaches, and we recommend that researchers should place more attention on their secondary loadings. We lastly call for a moratorium on Harman's one-factor test.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Ramani, Ravi S. ;
Alabduljader, Nawaf .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2023, 26 (01) :46-76
[2]   Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Gottfredson, Ryan K. ;
Joo, Harry .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (02) :270-301
[3]   Detecting Common Method Bias: Performance of the Harman's Single-Factor Test [J].
Aguirre-Urreta, Miguel, I ;
Hu, Jiang .
DATA BASE FOR ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 50 (02) :45-70
[4]  
BARTLETT MS, 1951, BIOMETRIKA, V38, P337, DOI 10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337
[5]  
Beavers AS., 2019, PRACTICAL ASSESS RES, V18, P6, DOI DOI 10.7275/QV2Q-RK76
[6]   An Empirical Kaiser Criterion [J].
Braeken, Johan ;
van Assen, Marcel A. L. M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 22 (03) :450-466
[7]  
Brown J, 2001, JALT TESTING EVALUAT, V5
[8]  
Brown JD., 2009, Shiken: JALT Test. Eval. SIG Newsl, V13, P20
[9]   From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research [J].
Chang, Sea-Jin ;
van Witteloostuijn, Arjen ;
Eden, Lorraine .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (02) :178-184
[10]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319