How do carbon trading price and carbon tax rate affect power project portfolio investment and carbon emission: An analysis based on uncertainty theory

被引:26
作者
Huang, Xiaoxia [1 ]
Kim, Jang Su [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Kwon Ryong [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Nam Hyok [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Kim Il Sung Univ, Inst Informat Technol, High Tech Res & Dev Ctr, Pyongyang, North Korea
[3] Kim Il Sung Univ, Inst Nat Sci, Pyongyang, North Korea
[4] Kim Il Sung Univ, Fac Informat Sci, Pyongyang, North Korea
关键词
Power project portfolio selection; Carbon emission trading; Carbon tax; Uncertainty theory; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; CHINA; ENERGY; IMPACT; POLICY; MODEL; VOLATILITY; MITIGATION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118768
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Responding to the social, economic, and environmental call to resolve current sustainability challenges, the concern about carbon dioxide emission reduction should be incorporated into the power investment decision process. Reflecting the low carbon emission requirement, this paper proposes a new optimization model for power project portfolio selection that simultaneously considers both of carbon emission trading scheme and carbon tax imposition. In this model, the initial investment outlay, the power sale price, the carbon trading price, and carbon tax rate are treated as uncertain variables considering the fast-changing environment and complex market situation. Incorporating the constraint on whether the carbon quota is exceeded into the model, two investment strategies are proposed for investors. Using the proposed model, the impact of the rises in carbon trading price and carbon tax rate on the investor's investment strategy selection and the carbon emission is simulated and analyzed through a case study. When the expected carbon price is 203.50 RMB/tCO2eq or less, a company should invest based on the strategy that annual emissions exceed the quota to obtain a maximum expected NPV which is larger than 408588 million RMB. When future carbon prices are 352.00, 500.50 and 649.00 RMB/tCO2-eq, the government should impose carbon tax rates of 30, 30, and 40 RMB/tCO2 on a power company, respectively, to obtain carbon emission reduction effect. At last, to see the contrast effect of the results from simultaneous implementation of both carbon trading and carbon tax, the results considering the carbon trading alone or carbon tax alone are discussed, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   PORTFOLIO APPROACH TO FOSSIL-FUEL PROCUREMENT IN ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY [J].
BARLEV, D ;
KATZ, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1976, 31 (03) :933-947
[2]  
BP, 2016, World Energy Outlook to 2035
[3]   China's emissions trading system and an ETS-carbon tax hybrid [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Ho, Mun S. ;
Jorgenson, Dale W. ;
Nielsen, Chris P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :741-753
[4]   Sustainable management of fossil fuels: A dynamic stochastic optimization approach with jump-diffusion [J].
Castellano, Rosella ;
Cerqueti, Roy ;
Spinesi, Luca .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 255 (01) :288-297
[5]   Urban planning policy and clean energy development Harmony- evidence from smart city pilot policy in China [J].
Chen, Pengyu ;
Dagestani, Abd Alwahed .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 210 :251-257
[6]   Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China's power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options [J].
Cong, Rong-Gang ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (09) :3921-3931
[7]   Verification of outcomes from carbon market under the clean development mechanism (CDM) projects in landfills [J].
Cruz, Silvia Stuchi ;
Paulino, Sonia ;
Paiva, Delhi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :145-156
[8]   Aligning renewable energy targets with carbon emissions trading to achieve China's INDCs: A general equilibrium assessment [J].
Dai, Hancheng ;
Xie, Yang ;
Liu, Jingyu ;
Masui, Toshihiko .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :4121-4131
[9]   Analysing decarbonizing strategies in the European power system applying stochastic dominance constraints [J].
Dominguez, Ruth ;
Vitali, Sebastiano ;
Carrion, Miguel ;
Moriggia, Vittorio .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 101 (101)
[10]   Integrated model for robust emission trading under uncertainties: Cost-effectiveness and environmental safety [J].
Ermoliev, Yuri ;
Ermolieva, Tatiana ;
Jonas, Matthias ;
Obersteiner, Michael ;
Wagner, Fabian ;
Winiwarter, Wilfried .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 98 :234-244