A critical review of cost-benefit analysis for business software investments

被引:0
作者
Sakthivel, Sachidanandam [1 ]
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Economic feasibility; Software investment; Software lifecycle costs; Maintenance costs; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNICAL DEBT; MAINTENANCE; DETERMINANTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/AJB-09-2022-0145
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeCost-benefit (C/B) analysis helps to determine the economic feasibility of business software investments. Research literature and published practices do not recognize substantial software maintenance costs in C/B analysis. Current analyses emphasize the benefits of an initial investment but do not consider the recurring benefits of each enhancement during the software lifecycle. Such analyses could lead to incorrect investment decisions and lost business opportunities. This article aims to review current research on software lifecycle costs and develop a theoretically sound C/B analysis.Design/methodology/approachThis article reviews current C/B analyses and discusses their shortcomings in treating the significant recurring maintenance costs. It analyzes the findings of various studies on software maintenance and synthesizes these findings to identify the nature of various maintenance costs and their benefits. Based on the synthesis, it theorizes various cost and benefit elements for inclusion in a revised C/B analysis.FindingsThis article identifies each recurring maintenance cost relevant to C/B analysis. It also identifies recurring benefits from each enhancement that hitherto have been omitted. Finally, this article discusses how these costs and benefits should be treated in the revised C/Bs analysis.Research limitations/implicationsThis is a conceptual paper proposing a new C/B analysis and requires an empirical validation.Practical implicationsThis article provides a revision of the C/B analysis that is long overdue. It will help to justify a software investment correctly, rank software projects that compete for limited funds and help create a sound software project portfolio. Since 20% of software products may incur 80% of software investment, this analysis will help to make correct software investments and avoid lost business opportunities. This article also describes a practical method to use the revised C/B analysis.Originality/valueThis article provides a revision of the C/B analysis that is long overdue. It will help to justify a software investment correctly, rank software projects that compete for limited funds and help create a sound software project portfolio. Since 20% of software products may incur 80% of software investment, this analysis will help to make correct software investments and avoid lost business opportunities. This article also describes a practical method to use the revised C/B analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 247
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Ali A.A., 2012, ISSUES INFORM SCI IN, V9, P339
  • [2] The financial aspect of managing technical debt: A systematic literature review
    Ampatzoglou, Areti
    Ampatzoglou, Apostolos
    Chatzigeorgiou, Alexander
    Avgeriou, Paris
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 64 : 52 - 73
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, 147642006 ISOIEC
  • [4] Applegate L.M., 1996, CORPORATE INFORM SYS, V4th
  • [5] Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process
    Ballantine, J
    Stray, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 13 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [6] Software Errors and Software Maintenance Management
    Rajiv D. Banker
    Srikant M. Datar
    Chris F. Kemerer
    Dani Zweig
    [J]. Information Technology and Management, 2002, 3 (1-2) : 25 - 41
  • [7] SOFTWARE COMPLEXITY AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
    BANKER, RD
    DATAR, SM
    KEMERER, CF
    ZWEIG, D
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1993, 36 (11) : 81 - 94
  • [8] Bloch M., 2012, MCKINSEY BUSINESS TE
  • [9] Brigham EugeneF., 2017, Fundamentals of Financial Management
  • [10] Calculating and Improving ROI in Software and System Programs
    Cantor, Murray
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2011, 54 (09) : 121 - 130