Chatbot-based learning of logical fallacies in EFL writing: perceived effectiveness in improving target knowledge and learner motivation

被引:22
作者
Zhang, Ruofei [1 ]
Zou, Di [2 ]
Cheng, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Math & Informat Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept English Language Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Chatbot; English writing; logical fallacy; second language writing; technology-enhanced language learning;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2023.2220374
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Chatbots have been increasingly applied for EFL education and demonstrated overall usefulness in improving knowledge and motivation, while this technology has yet to be used for learning logical fallacies (i.e. errors in reasoning) in EFL writing. However, knowledge of logical fallacies is essential, with which learners can avoid fallacies in EFL writing and have enhanced writing quality. To fill in the gap, this study investigated the perceived effectiveness of chatbots in developing knowledge of logical fallacy in EFL writing and enhancing learner motivation. Features of this learning method were also explored based on the comparison against website-based learning. Two groups of 15 Chinese EFL learners engaged in five-week autonomous, out-of-class, out-of-class learning of logical fallacies in EFL writing using a chatbot or a website. Semi-structured interviews, pre-post tests of fallacy knowledge and pre-post motivation questionnaires were conducted. The results showed that the chatbot was perceived as slightly less effective than the website in developing target knowledge but more effective in improving motivation. Compared to the website, chatbots were advantageous in high-quality human-computer interactions, study plan making, and high accessibility. Based on the research results, we discussed how this technology might influence fallacy learning based on the self-regulated learning framework.
引用
收藏
页码:5552 / 5569
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Digital storytelling with chatbots: mapping L2 participation and perception patterns [J].
Bailey, Daniel ;
Southam, Ashleigh ;
Costley, Jamie .
INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2021, 18 (01) :85-103
[2]  
Bassham G., 2010, Critical thinking: A student's introduction
[3]  
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI M, 1975, J HUMANIST PSYCHOL, V15, P41
[4]   The Relation Between Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement Across Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Dent, Amy L. ;
Koenka, Alison C. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 28 (03) :425-474
[5]   The qualitative research interview [J].
DiCicco-Bloom, B ;
Crabtree, BF .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (04) :314-321
[6]  
El Khoiri Niamika., 2017, Dinamika Ilmu, V17, P71, DOI [10.21093/di.v17i1.638, DOI 10.21093/DI.V17I1.638]
[7]   Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study [J].
El Shazly, Reham .
EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2021, 38 (03)
[8]   Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners [J].
Fryer, Luke K. ;
Ainley, Mary ;
Thompson, Andrew ;
Gibson, Aaron ;
Sherlock, Zelinda .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 75 :461-468
[9]  
Hsieh SW, 2011, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V14, P161
[10]   Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners speaking practice [J].
Hsu, Mei-Hua ;
Chen, Pei-Shih ;
Yu, Chi-Shun .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 31 (07) :4297-4308