Physiological Responses of Pea Plants to Salinity and Gibberellic Acid

被引:5
|
作者
Attia, Houneida [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taif Univ, Dept Biol, Coll Sci, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Tunis El Manar, Fac Sci Tunis, Dept Sci Biol, Lab Productiv Vegetale & Contraintes Environm, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
关键词
Pisum sativum L; salinity; gibberellic acid; growth; sugars; polyamines; SALT STRESS; POLYAMINE; GROWTH; PROLINE; L; CARBOHYDRATE; PARAMETERS; TOLERANCE; ROOT;
D O I
10.32604/phyton.2022.022363
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Pea is a seed legume. It is rich in cellulose fibre and protein. It is also a significant source of minerals and vitamins. In this paper, we set out to better characterize the physiological responses of Pisum sativum L. to the combined effects of NaCl, 100 mM and gibberellins (GA3). Our analysis revealed that NaCl caused a decrease in growth resulting in a reduction in root elongation, distribution and density, leaf number and leaf area, and a decrease in dry matter of roots and shoots. However, the contribution of GA3 in the salty environment induced an increase in these different parameters suggesting an improving effect of this hormone on growth of pea in presence of salt. NaCl also led to a disturbance of the photosynthetic machinery. Indeed, level of chlorophyll pigments (a and total) and photosynthetic activity were decreased compared to the control plants. However, the exogenous supply of GA3 restored this decrease in net CO2 assimilation, but not in chlorophyll content. Additional analyses were performed on the effect of salinity/GA3 interaction on osmolytes (soluble sugars and starch). Our results showed an increase in sugars and a decrease in starch in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. The salt-GA3 combination resulted in compensation of soluble sugar contents but not of starch contents, suggesting a beneficial effect of GA3 under saline stress conditions. Level of three main polyamines putrescine, spermidine, and spermine increased significantly in all organs of salt-treated plants.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 164
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physiological markers for salinity tolerance in plants
    Läuchli, A
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY AND IN VITRO BIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, 36 : 517 - 520
  • [32] PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF PLANTS TO SALINITY AND HUMIDITY
    RILEY, JJ
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1968, S 43 : S34 - &
  • [33] BLOCKAGE BY GIBBERELLIC ACID OF PHYTOCHROME EFFECTS ON GROWTH AUXIN RESPONSES AND FLAVONOID SYNTHESIS IN ETIOLATED PEA INTERNODES
    RUSSELL, DW
    GALSTON, AW
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1968, S 43 : S15 - &
  • [34] BLOCKAGE BY GIBBERELLIC ACID OF PHYTOCHROME EFFECTS ON GROWTH, AUXIN RESPONSES, AND FLAVONOID SYNTHESIS IN ETIOLATED PEA INTERNODES
    RUSSELL, DW
    GALSTON, AW
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 44 (09) : 1211 - +
  • [36] INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GIBBERELLIC ACID AND SALINITY ON THE GROWTH OF BEANS
    NIEMAN, RH
    BERNSTEIN, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1959, 46 (09) : 667 - 670
  • [37] Varietal differences in physiological and biochemical responses to salinity stress in six finger millet plants
    Asunta Mukami
    Alex Ng’etich
    Easter Syombua
    Richard Oduor
    Wilton Mbinda
    Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2020, 26 : 1569 - 1582
  • [38] Contrasting Physiological Responses of Jatropha curcas Plants to Single and Combined Stresses of Salinity and Heat
    Silva, Evandro N.
    Vieira, Suyanne A.
    Ribeiro, Rafael V.
    Ponte, Luiz F. A.
    Ferreira-Silva, Sergio L.
    Silveira, Joaquim A. G.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2013, 32 (01) : 159 - 169
  • [39] Contrasting Physiological Responses of Jatropha curcas Plants to Single and Combined Stresses of Salinity and Heat
    Evandro N. Silva
    Suyanne A. Vieira
    Rafael V. Ribeiro
    Luiz F. A. Ponte
    Sérgio L. Ferreira-Silva
    Joaquim A. G. Silveira
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2013, 32 : 159 - 169
  • [40] Role of salicylic acid on physiological and biochemical mechanism of salinity stress tolerance in plants
    Pramod Kumar Singh
    Shruti Gautam
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2013, 35 : 2345 - 2353