The interaction effect of online composite reviews and time pressure on information persuasiveness: A heuristic-systematic perspective

被引:10
作者
Chen, Chunfeng [1 ]
Zhang, Depeng [1 ]
Zhang, Fu [1 ]
Zhang, Fenghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510520, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Online composite reviews; Time pressure; Perceived fluency; Perceived accuracy; Information persuasiveness; PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE; DECISION-MAKING; IMPACT; DETERMINANTS; EXPERTISE; BEHAVIOR; QUALITY; GOALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101269
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies have found that contradictory composite reviews lead to a higher perception of utility, whereas others have found that consistent composite reviews are more persuasive. These contradictory findings emphasize the need to identify the role of contextual factors and individual differences in the effects of composite reviews. Based on the heuristic-systems model, this study aims to explore the interactive effect of composite reviews and time pressure on consumers' perception of information persuasiveness, and examine the moderating role of consumer knowledge. The results show that composite reviews and time pressure have interactive effects on information persuasiveness; consistent composite reviews are more persuasive to consumers under high time pressure situations; contradictory composite reviews are more persuasive under low time pressure situations; perceived fluency and perceived accuracy mediate the interaction effect of composite reviews and time pressure on information persuasiveness; and consumer knowledge further moderates the interaction effect of composite reviews and time pressure on information persuasiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   I seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion [J].
Aaker, JL ;
Lee, AY .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (01) :33-49
[2]   Mechanisms of consumers' trust development in reviewers' supplementary reviews: A reviewer-reader similarity perspective [J].
Akhtar, Naeem ;
Kim, Woo Gon ;
Ahmad, Wasim ;
Akhtar, Muhammad Nadeem ;
Siddiqi, Umar Iqbal ;
Riaz, Muhammad .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 31 :95-108
[3]   Time Pressure and User Ratings on Consumers' Choice and Eye Fixations [J].
Ammons, Jeremiah G. ;
Parker, Cody ;
Chen, Jing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2022, 38 (11) :993-1003
[4]   Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited [J].
Bigne, Enrique ;
Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi ;
Ruiz, Carla .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 115 :403-416
[5]   Price or quality? The influence of fluency on the dual role of price [J].
Chang, Chia-Jung .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2013, 24 (04) :369-380
[6]   The Sequence Effect of Supplementary Online Comments in Book Sales [J].
Chen, Hejie ;
Yan, Qiang ;
Xie, Mengjiao ;
Zhang, Duo ;
Chen, Yepeng .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :155650-155658
[7]   THE DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ONLINE PRODUCT REVIEWS ON PURCHASE DECISIONS [J].
Chen, Jia ;
Kou, Gang ;
Peng, Yi .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (05) :2045-2064
[8]  
Chen S, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P73
[9]   Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth [J].
Chen, Zoey ;
Lurie, Nicholas H. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2013, 50 (04) :463-476
[10]   The credibility and attribution of online reviews Differences between high and low product knowledge consumers [J].
Chiou, Jyh-Shen ;
Hsiao, Cheng-Chieh ;
Chiu, Tien-Yi .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2018, 42 (05) :630-646