University students? perceptions of interactive response system in an English language course: a case of Pear Deck

被引:5
作者
Anggoro, Kiki Juli [1 ]
Pratiwi, Damar Isti [2 ]
机构
[1] Walailak Univ, Sch Languages & Gen Educ, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
[2] Politekn Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun, Railway Mech Technol Study Program, Madiun, Indonesia
关键词
English language courses; interactive response system; learning; technology; Pear Deck; students? perceptions; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; LEARNING OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.25304/rlt.v31.2944
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Pear Deck is one interactive response system that has gained popularity in recent years. This study addressed the gap in the literature and considered students' experience of the platform in a Thai university context. This was a mixed-method study in which 320 students completed a survey including closed and open-ended components. Quantitative data measuring students' perceptions using Likert-scale surveys were collected, while qualitative data were used to get a deeper understanding of students' experience in learning using Pear Deck in the classroom. The data were analysed based on gender differences and students' proficiency levels. According to the findings of this study, students' perceptions were not significantly different based on gender. However, despite the finding that both basic and independent users had good attitudes towards the platforms, the latter group gave a substantially higher score. Furthermore, the study revealed that the students had a favourable impression of Pear Deck. They believed that the platform was engaging, easy to use, and had the potential to aid learning.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   EFL Students' Independent Learning with Pear Deck Interactive Slides [J].
Anggoro, Kiki J. ;
Khasanah, Uswatun .
STUDIES IN SELF-ACCESS LEARNING JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (01) :172-176
[2]   Pear Deck [J].
Anggoro, Kiki Juli .
RELC JOURNAL, 2021, 52 (03) :645-647
[3]   Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade [J].
Archambault, I. ;
Pagani, L. S. ;
Fitzpatrick, C. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 23 :1-9
[4]  
Awedh M., 2014, International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, V3, P17, DOI DOI 10.5121/IJITE.2014.3402
[5]  
Balta N, 2017, European Journal of Educational Research, Vvolum, P385, DOI [10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.385, 10.12973/eujer.6.3.385, DOI 10.12973/EUJER.6.3.385, DOI 10.12973/EU-JER.6.3.385, 10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.385]
[6]  
Collins Linda J., 2007, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, V26, P81, DOI 10.1300/J115v26n01_08
[7]  
Creamer E.G., 2017, INTRO FULLY INTEGRAT
[8]   Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe [J].
Cuadrado-Garcia, Manuel ;
Ruiz-Molinaa, Maria-Eugenia ;
Montoro-Pons, Juan D. .
INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02) :367-371
[9]  
Dong Y, 2018, SOC INFORM TECHNOLOG, V2018, P743
[10]  
El Shaban A., 2017, Teaching English with Technology, V17, P64