Prediction of adaptive strategies based on deformation vector field features for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer

被引:4
作者
Xia, Wen-Long [1 ]
Liang, Bin [1 ]
Men, Kuo [1 ]
Zhang, Ke [1 ]
Tian, Yuan [1 ]
Li, Ming-Hui [1 ]
Lu, Ning-Ning [1 ]
Li, Ye-Xiong [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Jian-Rong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union MedicalCollege, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
adaptive strategy; deformation vector field; machine learning; MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy; IMAGE REGISTRATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; ALGORITHMS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16192
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe selection of adaptive strategies in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) usually relies on subjective review of anatomical changes. However, this kind of review may lead to improper selection of adaptive strategy for some fractions. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop prediction models based on deformation vector field (DVF) features for automatic and accurate strategy selection, using prostate cancer as an example. Methods100 fractions of 20 prostate cancer patients were retrospectively selected in this study. Treatment plans using both adapt to position (ATP) strategy and adapt to shape (ATS) strategy were generated. Optimal adaptive strategy was determined according to dosimetric evaluation. DVFs of the deformable image registration (DIR) of daily MRI and CT simulation scans were extracted. The shape, first order statistics, and spatial features were extracted from the DVFs, subjected to further selection using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method. The number of features (F-n) was hyper-tuned using bootstrapping method, and then F-n indicating a peak area under the curve (AUC) value was used to construct three prediction models. ResultsAccording to subjective review, the ATS strategy was adopted for all 100 fractions. However, the evaluation results showed that the ATP strategy could have met the clinical requirements for 23 (23%) fractions. The three prediction models showed high prediction performance, with the best performing model achieving an AUC value of 0.896, corresponding accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPC) of 0.9, 0.958, and 0.667, respectively. The features used to construct prediction models included four features extracted from y direction of DVF (DVFy) and mask, one feature from z direction of DVF (DVFz). It indicated that the deformation along the anterior-posterior direction had a greater impact on determining the adaptive strategy than other directions. ConclusionsDVF-feature-based models could accurately predict the adaptive strategy and avoid unnecessary selection of time-consuming ATS strategy, which consequently improves the efficiency of the MRgART process.
引用
收藏
页码:3573 / 3583
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios
    Leijenaar, Ralph T. H.
    Parmar, Chintan
    Grossmann, Patrick
    Cavalho, Sara
    Bussink, Johan
    Monshouwer, Rene
    Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
    Rietveld, Derek
    Hoebers, Frank
    Rietbergen, Michelle M.
    Leemans, C. Rene
    Dekker, Andre
    Quackenbush, John
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Lambin, Philippe
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 5
  • [2] Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
    Brand, Douglas H.
    Tree, Alison C.
    Ostler, Peter
    van der Voet, Hans
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Chu, William
    Ford, Daniel
    Tolan, Shaun
    Jain, Suneil
    Martin, Alexander
    Staffurth, John
    Camilleri, Philip
    Kancherla, Kiran
    Frew, John
    Chan, Andrew
    Dayes, Ian S.
    Henderson, Daniel
    Brown, Stephanie
    Cruickshank, Clare
    Burnett, Stephanie
    Duffton, Aileen
    Griffin, Clare
    Hinder, Victoria
    Morrison, Kirsty
    Naismith, Olivia
    Hall, Emma
    van As, Nicholas
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (11) : 1531 - 1543
  • [3] Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task
    Brock, Kristy K.
    Mutic, Sasa
    McNutt, Todd R.
    Li, Hua
    Kessler, Marc L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (07) : E43 - E76
  • [4] Intrafraction motion quantification and planning target volume margin determination of head-and-neck tumors using cine magnetic resonance imaging
    Bruijnen, Tom
    Stemkens, Bjorn
    Terhaard, Chris H. J.
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 130 : 82 - 88
  • [5] MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives
    Corradini, S.
    Alongi, F.
    Andratschke, N.
    Belka, C.
    Boldrini, L.
    Cellini, F.
    Debus, J.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Hoerner-Rieber, J.
    Lagerwaard, F. J.
    Mazzola, R.
    Palacios, M. A.
    Philippens, M. E. P.
    Raaijmakers, C. P. J.
    Terhaard, C. H. J.
    Valentini, V.
    Niyazi, M.
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [6] Automatic Substitute Computed Tomography Generation and Contouring for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Alone External Beam Radiation Therapy From Standard MRI Sequences
    Dowling, Jason A.
    Sun, Jidi
    Pichler, Peter
    Rivest-Henault, David
    Ghose, Soumya
    Richardson, Haylea
    Wratten, Chris
    Martin, Jarad
    Arm, Jameen
    Best, Leah
    Chandra, Shekhar S.
    Fripp, Jurgen
    Menk, Frederick W.
    Greer, Peter B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (05): : 1144 - 1153
  • [7] Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) : 563 - 577
  • [8] On the Need for Comprehensive Validation of Deformable Image Registration, Investigated With a Novel 3-Dimensional Deformable Dosimeter
    Juang, Titania
    Das, Shiva
    Adamovics, John
    Benning, Ron
    Oldham, Mark
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : 414 - 421
  • [9] Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective
    Kang, John
    Schwartz, Russell
    Flickinger, John
    Beriwal, Sushil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (05): : 1127 - 1135
  • [10] The Australian Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Linac Program
    Keall, Paul J.
    Barton, Michael
    Crozier, Stuart
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 203 - 206