A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty

被引:5
作者
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. [1 ]
Okoeki, Mabel [1 ]
Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye [1 ]
Khamis, Assem [1 ]
Clark, Joseph [1 ]
Boland, Jason W. [1 ]
Pask, Sophie [1 ]
Nwulu, Ugochinyere [1 ]
Elliott-Button, Helene [1 ]
Folwell, Anna [2 ]
Harman, Daniel [2 ]
Johnson, Miriam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] City Hlth Care Partnership, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
Older people; Frailty; Wellbeing; Multidisciplinary team; Integrated care; Quality of life; Proactive care; HEALTH; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. Methods A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (>= 65 years, electronic Frailty Index >= 0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17. Results 199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS-5 versus 2, p < 0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI:-9.01:-4.26, p < 0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI:-8.91:-3.80, p < 0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI:-12.80:-2.96, p < 0.001). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Abernethy Amy P, 2005, BMC Palliat Care, V4, P7
  • [2] Applying Propensity Score Methods in Clinical Research in Neurology
    Austin, Peter C.
    Yu, Amy Ying Xin
    Vyas, Manav V.
    Kapral, Moira K.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2021, 97 (18) : 856 - 863
  • [3] The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments
    Austin, Peter C.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (07) : 1242 - 1258
  • [4] Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community
    Bernabei, R
    Landi, F
    Gambassi, G
    Sgadari, J
    Zuccala, G
    Mor, V
    Rubenstein, LZ
    Carbonin, P
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7141): : 1348 - 1351
  • [5] Influences on emergency department attendance among frail older people with deteriorating health: a multicentre prospective cohort study
    Bone, A. E.
    Evans, C. J.
    Henson, L. A.
    Etkind, S. N.
    Higginson, I. J.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 194 : 4 - 10
  • [6] Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for community-dwelling, high-risk, frail, older people
    Briggs, Robert
    McDonough, Anna
    Ellis, Graham
    Bennett, Kathleen
    O'Neill, Desmond
    Robinson, David
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [7] Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data
    Clegg, Andrew
    Bates, Chris
    Young, John
    Ryan, Ronan
    Nichols, Linda
    Teale, Elizabeth Ann
    Mohammed, Mohammed A.
    Parry, John
    Marshall, Tom
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2016, 45 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [8] James Mackenzie Lecture 2011: multimorbidity, goal-oriented care, and equity
    De Maeseneer, Jan
    Boeckxstaens, Pauline
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (600)
  • [9] Palliative care symptoms, concerns and well-being of older people with frailty and complex care needs upon hospital discharge: a cross-sectional study
    de Nooijer, Kim
    Van Den Noortgate, Nele
    Pype, Peter
    Van den Block, Lieve
    Pivodic, Lara
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [10] Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners
    Desai, Rishi J.
    Franklin, Jessica M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367