What makes domain knowledge difficult? Word usage frequency from SUBTLEX and dlexDB explains knowledge item difficulty

被引:1
作者
Ludewig, Ulrich [1 ]
Alscher, Pascal [1 ]
Chen, Xiaobin [2 ]
McElvany, Nele [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Dortmund Univ, Ctr Res Educ & Sch Dev IFS, Dortmund, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Hector Res Inst Educ Sci & Psychol, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Political knowledge; Word frequency; Item difficulty; Statistical suppression effect; Educational assessment; ACADEMIC VOCABULARY; POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE; SUPPRESSION; IMPUTATION; CHOICE; TESTS;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-022-01918-0
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
The quality of tests in psychological and educational assessment is of great scholarly and public interest. Item difficulty models are vital to generating test result interpretations based on evidence. A major determining factor of item difficulty in knowledge tests is the opportunity to learn about the facts and concepts in question. Knowledge is mainly conveyed through language. Exposure to language associated with facts and concepts might be an indicator of the opportunity to learn. Thus, we hypothesize that item difficulty in knowledge tests should be related to the probability of exposure to the item content in everyday life and/or academic settings and therefore also to word frequency. Results from a study with 99 political knowledge test items administered to N = 250 German seventh (age: 11-14 years) and tenth (age: 15-18 years) graders showed that word frequencies in everyday settings (SUBTLEX-DE) explain variance in item difficulty, while word frequencies in academic settings (dlexDB) alone do not. However, both types of word frequency combined explain a considerable amount of the variance in item difficulty. Items with words that are more frequent in both settings and, in particular, relatively frequent in everyday settings are easier. High word frequencies and relatively higher word frequency in everyday settings could be associated with higher probability of exposure, conceptual complexity, and better readability of item content. Examining word frequency from different language settings can help researchers investigate test score interpretations and is a useful tool for predicting item difficulty and refining knowledge test items.
引用
收藏
页码:2621 / 2637
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Akinwande MO., 2015, Open J Stat, V5, P754, DOI [DOI 10.4236/OJS.2015.57075, 10.4236/ojs.2015.57075]
[2]  
Alscher P, 2022, Z ERZIEHWISS, V25, P1221, DOI 10.1007/s11618-022-01085-0
[3]  
American Psychological Association, 2020, APA GUID PSYCH ASS E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TAM TEST ANAL MODULE
[5]   Reading Demands in Secondary School: Does the Linguistic Complexity of Textbooks Increase With Grade Level and the Academic Orientation of the School Track? [J].
Berendes, Karin ;
Vajjala, Sowmya ;
Meurers, Detmar ;
Bryant, Doreen ;
Wagner, Wolfgang ;
Chinkina, Maria ;
Trautwein, Ulrich .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 110 (04) :518-543
[6]   Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge [J].
Bischof, Daniel ;
Senninger, Roman .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 57 (02) :473-495
[7]   Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Mandera, Pawel ;
McCormick, Samantha F. ;
Keuleers, Emmanuel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (02) :467-479
[8]   The Word Frequency Effect in Word Processing: An Updated Review [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Mandera, Pawel ;
Keuleers, Emmanuel .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (01) :45-50
[9]   The Word Frequency Effect A Review of Recent Developments and Implications for the Choice of Frequency Estimates in German [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Buchmeier, Matthias ;
Conrad, Markus ;
Jacobs, Arthur M. ;
Boelte, Jens ;
Boehl, Andrea .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 58 (05) :412-424
[10]  
Care E., 2018, Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_1]