The superselective intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin and concomitant radiotherapy (RADPLAT) is effective for metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundSuperselective intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin and concomitant radiotherapy (RADPLAT) is a very promising treatment modality for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are some concerns regarding its potential for the control of neck lymph node metastasis. The objective of this study was to investigate whether RADPLAT provided inferior regional control compared to intravenous chemoradiotherapy (IV-CRT).MethodsA total of 172 patients with neck lymph node metastases, 66 of whom underwent RADPLAT and 106 IV-CRT, were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively compared regional control rates between RADPLAT and IV-CRT. Furthermore, to adjust for differences in factors related to patient background between the groups, we conducted inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis using the propensity score.ResultsA comparison between the two groups revealed that the regional control rates were almost equal under unadjusted conditions; however, after adjustment by IPW analysis, the RADPLAT group had a relatively better regional control rate than did the IV-CRT group (1 year regional control rate: 86.6% vs. 79.4%). In addition, the analysis of relative risk factors for regional control in the RADPLAT group showed that the absence of intra-arterial cisplatin infusion into metastatic lymph nodes was the only independent risk factor (Hazard ratio: 4.23, p = 0.04).ConclusionThis study showed that the regional control rate in patients treated with RADPLAT was noninferior to that for IV-CRT. Locally advanced head and neck cancers is a good indication for RADPLAT, even if the patients have neck lymph node metastases.