Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Cheng-Chia [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Yu-Chuen [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Chih-Chuan [1 ,6 ]
Chen, Yu-Jen [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Tradit Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] MacKay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Coll Chinese Med, Sch Chinese Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] MacKay Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
anterior to psoas; MI-TLIF; CBT; interbody fusion; LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; DECOMPRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; POSTERIOR; OUTCOMES; SPINE;
D O I
10.6890/IJGE.202304_17(2).0010
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between an anterior to psoas (ATP) ap-proach combined with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) fixation (ATP group) and minimally invasive trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) combined with CBT fixation (MI-TLIF group) for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease and instability. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent interbody fusion and internal fixa-tion between May 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, using the ATP or MI-TLIF approach to treat degen-erative lumbar disc disease and instability. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) results, blood loss, operation time, complications, and bony fusion were analyzed and compared to understand clinical outcomes. Clinical and radiologic follow-up for all patients was at least 12 months. Results: The ATP approach combined with CBT fixation resulted in less blood loss, earlier reduced VAS scores, better ODI scores, but longer operation time. At 12 months, the fusion rates in the ATP and MI-TLIF groups were 90% (18/20) and 72% (13/18), respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation had the advantage of less blood loss, earlier recovery in VAS scores, and better ODI than in MI-TLIF. Indirect and direct de-compression could be successfully integrated by the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation and laminectomy.Copyright (c) 2023, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 134
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Letter to the editor regarding "Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis"
    Miller, Larry E.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [42] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Easley, Kirk
    Lee, Jun-Seok
    Hong, Jae-Young
    Virk, Michael
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    Yoon, Sangwook T.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 143S - 150S
  • [43] Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Daniel C.
    Laskay, Nicholas
    Alcala, Christopher
    Schwender, James
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (10): : E416 - E422
  • [44] Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Fan, Guoxin
    Wu, Xinbo
    Yu, Shunzhi
    Sun, Qi
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    He, Shisheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [45] Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral decompression incision of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases
    Zhao, Yongzhao
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Zhang, Hailong
    Wang, Chuanfeng
    He, Shisheng
    Gu, Guangfei
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (12) : 2835 - 2842
  • [46] Comparison of clinical efficacy and surgeon's neck flexion time between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion in the treatment of single-level lumbar degenerative diseases: a single center retrospective study
    Wei, Wen-Bo
    Dang, Sha-Jie
    Duan, Da-Peng
    Zhao, Wei
    Wei, Ling
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [47] RETRACTED: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease (Retracted Article)
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09):
  • [48] Application and thinking of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
    Gu, Shao
    Li, Haifeng
    Wang, Daxing
    Dai, Xuejun
    Liu, Chengwei
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [49] Health state utility of patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc arthroplasty
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    Goz, Vadim
    McAnany, Steven
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Hecht, Andrew C.
    Delamarter, Rick B.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (05) : 475 - 479
  • [50] Complications with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in the Obese Population
    Buyuk, Abdul Fettah
    Shafa, Eiman
    Dawson, John M.
    Schwender, James D.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (23) : E1401 - E1408