Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Cheng-Chia [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Yu-Chuen [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Chih-Chuan [1 ,6 ]
Chen, Yu-Jen [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Tradit Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] MacKay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Coll Chinese Med, Sch Chinese Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] MacKay Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
anterior to psoas; MI-TLIF; CBT; interbody fusion; LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; DECOMPRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; POSTERIOR; OUTCOMES; SPINE;
D O I
10.6890/IJGE.202304_17(2).0010
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between an anterior to psoas (ATP) ap-proach combined with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) fixation (ATP group) and minimally invasive trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) combined with CBT fixation (MI-TLIF group) for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease and instability. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent interbody fusion and internal fixa-tion between May 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, using the ATP or MI-TLIF approach to treat degen-erative lumbar disc disease and instability. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) results, blood loss, operation time, complications, and bony fusion were analyzed and compared to understand clinical outcomes. Clinical and radiologic follow-up for all patients was at least 12 months. Results: The ATP approach combined with CBT fixation resulted in less blood loss, earlier reduced VAS scores, better ODI scores, but longer operation time. At 12 months, the fusion rates in the ATP and MI-TLIF groups were 90% (18/20) and 72% (13/18), respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation had the advantage of less blood loss, earlier recovery in VAS scores, and better ODI than in MI-TLIF. Indirect and direct de-compression could be successfully integrated by the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation and laminectomy.Copyright (c) 2023, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 134
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level disc degenerative disease with preoperative reversible kyphosis
    Hu, Xu
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Beiyu
    Hong, Ying
    Rong, Xin
    Pu, Dan
    Huang, Kangkang
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 202
  • [32] Cochrane in CORR A® : Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Evaniew, Nathan
    Madden, Kim
    Bhandari, Mohit
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (03) : 802 - 808
  • [33] Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease A Cochrane Review
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : E1096 - E1107
  • [34] Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Sheng, Sun-Ren
    Geng, Yi-Bo
    Zhou, Kai-Liang
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Ni, Wen-Fei
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [35] Obesity and Clinical, Radiographic, and Surgical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Single-Level Transforaminal versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Eghrari, Nafis B.
    Lee, Jonathan J.
    Giraldo, Juan P.
    Choy, Winward
    Williams, Gabriella P.
    O'Neill, Luke K.
    Zhou, James J.
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Abbatematteo, Joseph M.
    Saribekyan, Hovhannes M.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Snyder, Laura A.
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 195
  • [36] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery
    Brodano, Giovanni B.
    Martikos, Konstantinos
    Lolli, Francesco
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    Cioni, Alfredo
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Di Silvestre, Mario
    Boriani, Stefano
    Greggi, Tiziana
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (10): : E559 - E564
  • [37] Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications After Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [38] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101
  • [39] Safety and Efficacy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Combined with Facet Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Kong, Xiaoqian
    Li, Bohan
    Xu, Leixin
    Li, Jianmin
    Gao, Chunzheng
    Wu, Dongjin
    Ma, Shengzhong
    Song, Yang
    Zhao, Jie
    Wang, Xiaoyun
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (06) : 1617 - 1626
  • [40] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E1208 - E1218