Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Cheng-Chia [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Yu-Chuen [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Chih-Chuan [1 ,6 ]
Chen, Yu-Jen [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Tradit Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] MacKay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Coll Chinese Med, Sch Chinese Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] MacKay Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
anterior to psoas; MI-TLIF; CBT; interbody fusion; LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; DECOMPRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; POSTERIOR; OUTCOMES; SPINE;
D O I
10.6890/IJGE.202304_17(2).0010
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between an anterior to psoas (ATP) ap-proach combined with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) fixation (ATP group) and minimally invasive trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) combined with CBT fixation (MI-TLIF group) for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease and instability. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent interbody fusion and internal fixa-tion between May 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, using the ATP or MI-TLIF approach to treat degen-erative lumbar disc disease and instability. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) results, blood loss, operation time, complications, and bony fusion were analyzed and compared to understand clinical outcomes. Clinical and radiologic follow-up for all patients was at least 12 months. Results: The ATP approach combined with CBT fixation resulted in less blood loss, earlier reduced VAS scores, better ODI scores, but longer operation time. At 12 months, the fusion rates in the ATP and MI-TLIF groups were 90% (18/20) and 72% (13/18), respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation had the advantage of less blood loss, earlier recovery in VAS scores, and better ODI than in MI-TLIF. Indirect and direct de-compression could be successfully integrated by the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation and laminectomy.Copyright (c) 2023, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 134
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
    Xie, Tianhang
    Wang, Chaoyang
    Yang, Zhiqiang
    Xiu, Peng
    Yang, Xi
    Wang, Xiandi
    Wang, Duan
    Song, Yueming
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 135 : e671 - e678
  • [22] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (11) : 2300 - 2305
  • [23] Comparing OLIF Combined with Lateral Screw Fixation versus Minimally Invasive TLIF for Treating Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Li, Shuo
    Yang, Zhiyun
    Yan, Weishun
    Da, Chaoming
    Niu, Weimin
    Qu, Tao
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, : 254 - 264
  • [24] Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [25] A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Singh, Kern
    Nandyala, Sreeharsha V.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Fineberg, Steven J.
    Oglesby, Mathew
    Pelton, Miguel A.
    Andersson, Gunnar B.
    Isayeva, Darya
    Jegier, Briana J.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (08) : 1694 - 1701
  • [26] Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    Park, Yung
    Lee, Byung Ho
    Yoon, So Ra
    Ha, Joong-Won
    Kim, Hyunkyo
    Suk, Kyung-Soo
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    Kim, Hak-Sun
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (11) : 773 - 780
  • [27] Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis
    Heemskerk, Johan L.
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun Oluwadara
    Clifton, William
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley O.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (12) : 2049 - 2065
  • [28] Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Choi, Un Yong
    Park, Jeong Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
  • [29] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Samuel, Andre M.
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Morse, Kyle W.
    Song, Junho
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Jordan, Yusef J.
    Gang, Catherine H.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (21) : 1505 - 1514
  • [30] Smoking Is Associated With Lower Satisfaction in Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Gatoi, Cheryl
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Gold, Graham S.
    Mohan, Niraj
    Yongqiang, Chen Jerry
    Ling, Zhixing Marcus
    Soh, Reuben C. C.
    Yuc, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang-Ming
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E19 - E25