Performance evaluation of sustainability in a textile firm via multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:0
|
作者
Gonca, Simsek Guenduez [1 ]
Cagdas, Guenduez [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Denizli Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Dept Text Technol, TR-20160 Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Appl Sci, Dept Capital Market, TR-20600 Denizli, Turkiye
来源
INDUSTRIA TEXTILA | 2023年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
sustainability; environmental indicators; performance evaluation; TOPSIS; textile; TOPSIS; SELECTION; INDUSTRY; POLICY;
D O I
10.35530/IT.074.04.202270
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Today, the sustainability approach is an integral part of business life. Especially, considering the damage that various events can cause to the environment, environmental sustainability (ES) is getting much more attention. From this aspect, the textile industry which can cause serious environmental damage, should integrate a sustainability approach into its management concept. Therefore, decision-makers and practitioners need to evaluate the sustainability performance of the industry. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods help them to evaluate sustainability performance usefully. This paper evaluates the sustainability performance of a selected company in the textile industry over the years by environmental performance indicators. The technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodology is used to evaluate sustainability performance.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review
    Sharma, Tina
    Kumar, Anuj
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 143704 - 143720
  • [42] The vital-immaterial-mediocre multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zakeri, Shervin
    Ecer, Fatih
    Konstantas, Dimitri
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (03) : 937 - 963
  • [43] An improved multi-criteria emergency decision-making method in environmental disasters
    Guang-Jun Jiang
    Hong-Xia Chen
    Hong-Hua Sun
    Mohammad Yazdi
    Arman Nedjati
    Kehinde Adewale Adesina
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 10351 - 10379
  • [44] Extending the WEDBA to the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making environment
    Al-Hawari, Tarek
    Naji, Ahmed
    Alshraideh, Hussam
    Bataineh, Omar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 59 (04) : 330 - 346
  • [45] A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Method for the Financial Statement Quality Evaluation
    Nguyen Thi Hoai Thuong
    Li, Zongmin
    Phi Thi Diem Hong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 502 : 659 - 676
  • [46] Manufacturing Industry Performance Appraisals: Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Andriani, Debrina Puspita
    Wijayanti, Febry
    Rahmani, Ilma Visi
    Aini, Azizah Putri Nur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2022, 14 (06): : 28 - 37
  • [47] Streamlining apartment provider evaluation: A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model
    Nguyen, Phi -Hung
    Tran, Thu-Hien
    Nguyen, Lan-Anh Thi
    Pham, Hong-Anh
    Pham, Mai-Anh Thi
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [48] Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Guo, Sen
    Zhao, Haoran
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 121 : 23 - 31
  • [49] Evaluation of supplier performance of high-speed train based on multi-stage multi-criteria decision-making method
    Xue Min
    Fu Chao
    Feng Nan-Ping
    Lu Guang-Yan
    Chang Wen-Jun
    Yang Shan-Lin
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 238 - 251
  • [50] Sustainability evaluation of power generation technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision Making: The Kenyan case
    Manirambona, Egide
    Talai, Stephen M.
    Kimutai, Stephen K.
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 (14901-14914) : 14901 - 14914