Performance evaluation of sustainability in a textile firm via multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:0
|
作者
Gonca, Simsek Guenduez [1 ]
Cagdas, Guenduez [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Denizli Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Dept Text Technol, TR-20160 Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Appl Sci, Dept Capital Market, TR-20600 Denizli, Turkiye
来源
INDUSTRIA TEXTILA | 2023年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
sustainability; environmental indicators; performance evaluation; TOPSIS; textile; TOPSIS; SELECTION; INDUSTRY; POLICY;
D O I
10.35530/IT.074.04.202270
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Today, the sustainability approach is an integral part of business life. Especially, considering the damage that various events can cause to the environment, environmental sustainability (ES) is getting much more attention. From this aspect, the textile industry which can cause serious environmental damage, should integrate a sustainability approach into its management concept. Therefore, decision-makers and practitioners need to evaluate the sustainability performance of the industry. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods help them to evaluate sustainability performance usefully. This paper evaluates the sustainability performance of a selected company in the textile industry over the years by environmental performance indicators. The technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodology is used to evaluate sustainability performance.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review
    Yuan, Zheng
    Wen, Baohua
    He, Cheng
    Zhou, Jin
    Zhou, Zhonghua
    Xu, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [22] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [23] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [24] Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach for Supplier Evaluation in Fuzzy Environment
    Bhayana, Nidhi
    Gandhi, Kanika
    Jha, P. C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2015), VOL 2, 2016, 437 : 991 - 1009
  • [25] Evaluation of equipment maintenance quality: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Zhang, Libin
    Zhang, Lele
    Shan, Hongying
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [26] A group multi-criteria decision-making based on best-worst method
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Khansefid, Saba
    Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 126 : 111 - 121
  • [27] A multi-criteria decision-making based approach to assess the sustainability of concrete structures
    de la Fuente, Albert
    Fernandez-Ordonez, David
    FIB CONFERENCE: SUSTAINABLE CONCRETE: MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 2018, 442
  • [28] Multi-criteria decision-making method for evaluation of investment in enhanced geothermal systems projects
    Raos, Sara
    Hranic, Josipa
    Rajsl, Ivan
    ENERGY AND AI, 2024, 17
  • [29] Assessment of urban surface performance of open spaces with multi-criteria decision-making method
    Serdar Yakut, Elif Safiye
    Cenani, Sehnaz
    Cagdas, Gulen
    MEGARON, 2022, 17 (04): : 658 - 672
  • [30] Sustainability driven multi-criteria project portfolio selection under uncertain decision-making environment
    Ma, Junfeng
    Harstvedt, James D.
    Jaradat, Raed
    Smith, Brian
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 140