Does corporate risk management lead to risk mitigation and firm performance? Evidence from Asian emerging markets

被引:5
作者
Khan, Asad [1 ]
Rehman, Zia Ur [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad Ibrahim [2 ]
Badshah, Imtiaz [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haripur, Inst Management Sci, Haripur, Pakistan
[2] Abdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Inst Business Studies & Leadership, Mardan, Pakistan
[3] Ostfold Univ Coll Halden Campus Lib, Fac Business Language & Social Sci, Halden, Norway
来源
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW | 2024年 / 47卷 / 03期
关键词
Risk and return; Firm-specific risk; Systematic risk; Stakeholder; Enterprise risk management; Firm cost; Strategic management; D23; G32; L25; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; RETURN PARADOX; DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY; ACCOUNTING RISK; COST; OWNERSHIP; ECONOMIES; CREATION; PRICES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/MRR-11-2022-0776
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to verify the significance of Andersen (2008) corporate risk management (CRM) framework in Asian emerging markets (AEMs) to control firm risk and improve firm performance. Design/methodology/approachThe cross-sectional analyses are performed on a sample of 4,609 firms across nine Asian emerging countries using 2SLS estimation technique. FindingsThe empirical findings show that the adoption of CRM not only enhances firm performance by increasing the firm ability to capitalize on the market opportunity but also plays a significant role in reducing firm risk. The findings of this study assert that by institutionalizing risk management practices into an integrated CRM framework, the firm can reap multiple benefits by maintaining better contractual agreements and strategic partnerships with key stakeholders. Originality/valueThe study shifts the focus of CRM away from Western countries toward AEMs, which has been afflicted by high risks and uncertainties. The effectiveness of CRM against firm risk is established by dividing firm risk into firm-specific risk and systematic risk. Furthermore, this study also establishes that CRM not only leads to high returns but also reduces firm operational and production costs. Overall, the study provides a compelling argument to implement CRM for improving organizational performance and managing risks in a strategic and integrated manner. The findings are also relevant to risk management practitioners, as well as to academicians interested in the broader fields of corporate finance and strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 352
页数:24
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
Aisyah Ratri Amelia, 2019, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, V34, P211
[2]   Market performance and deviance from industry norms: (Mis)alignment of organizational risk and industry risk [J].
Alessandri, Todd M. ;
Khan, Raihan H. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2006, 59 (10-11) :1105-1115
[3]  
AMIT R, 1990, ACAD MANAGE J, V33, P520, DOI 10.5465/256579
[4]  
AMIT R, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P154, DOI 10.5465/256502
[5]   Strategic responsiveness and Bowman's risk-return paradox [J].
Andersen, Torben J. ;
Denrell, Jerker ;
Bettis, Richard A. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (04) :407-429
[6]   The performance relationship of effective risk management: Exploring the firm-specific investment rationale [J].
Andersen, Torben Juul .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2008, 41 (02) :155-176
[7]   Multinational risk and performance outcomes: Effects of knowledge intensity and industry context [J].
Andersen, Torben Juul .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2012, 21 (02) :239-252
[8]   Effective risk management outcomes: exploring effects of innovation and capital structure [J].
Andersen, Torben Juul .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 2 (04) :352-+
[9]   All risk-taking is not the same: examining the competing effects of firm risk-taking with meta-analysis [J].
Arrfelt, Mathias ;
Mannor, Michael ;
Nahrgang, Jennifer D. ;
Christensen, Amanda L. .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 12 (03) :621-660
[10]  
Aybar B., 2005, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, V6, P5