Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study

被引:2
作者
Sato, Noriko [1 ]
Fujita, Kenji [2 ,3 ]
Okada, Hiroshi [4 ]
Kushida, Kazuki [5 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Hlth Informat, Sch Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Showa Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Pharm, Tokyo, Japan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; GERIATRIC MEDICINE; Quality in health care; Health & safety; CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; OLDER-PEOPLE; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess measurement properties of 121 face and content validated quality indicators (QIs) for medication safety in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care. Design A mixed methods study: a 6-month observational study in primary care (July-December 2020) and in-depth semistructured online interviews with participants (February-March 2021). Setting Sixty community pharmacies in Japan. Participants Patients aged 75 years and older who were regularly taking six or more prescription medicines for >4 weeks were eligible. The observational study included 457 patients. The interviews were undertaken with 26 community pharmacists, including pharmacy managers and owners. Primary and secondary outcome measures Five measurement properties of QIs (applicability, improvement potential, acceptability, implementation issues and sensitivity to change) were evaluated. A web application was developed for data reporting and data visualisation. Results This study showed that 53 QIs met the measurement properties of applicability, improvement potential, acceptability and implementation issues. Of 53 QIs, 17 also had a high sensitivity to change. Interviews identified eight themes (indicator characteristics, web application, policy, patient, time, competence, pharmacy administration and collaboration) in relation to the consequence of implementation of QIs. Conclusions A set of 121 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was field tested for their five measurement properties. This QI set can be used to identify patients who may benefit from clinician reviews of their medicines. These QIs may be applied at different levels within the healthcare system: patient, pharmacy, regional and national levels. Further mechanisms to automatically collect and report data should be established to facilitate sustainable quality improvement initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Home healthcare professionals' perspectives on quality dimensions for home pharmaceutical care in Japan
    Fujita, Kenji
    Kushida, Kazuki
    Moles, Rebekah J.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 19 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [12] Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review
    Fujita, Kenji
    Moles, Rebekah J.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [13] Gallagher P, 2008, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V46, P72
  • [14] Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline
    Hermens, R. P. M. G.
    Ouwens, M. M. T. J.
    Vonk-Okhuijsen, S. Y.
    van der Wel, Y.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G.
    van den Broeke, L. D.
    Ho, V. K. Y.
    Janssen-Heijnen, M. L. G.
    Groen, H. J. M.
    Grol, R. P. T. M.
    Wollersheim, H. C. H.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2006, 54 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [15] Perioperative diabetes care: development and validation of quality indicators throughout the entire hospital care pathway
    Hommel, Inge
    van Gurp, Petra J.
    Tack, Cees J.
    Wollersheim, Hub
    Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (07) : 525 - 534
  • [16] Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review
    Joling, Karlijn J.
    van Eenoo, Liza
    Vetrano, Davide L.
    Smaardijk, Veerle R.
    Declercq, Anja
    Onder, Graziano
    van Hout, Hein P. J.
    van der Roest, Henriette G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):
  • [17] Prevalence of hospitalisation caused by adverse drug reactions at an internal medicine ward of a single centre in Japan: a cross-sectional study
    Komagamine, Junpei
    Kobayashi, Masaki
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [18] Awareness and current implementation of drug dosage adjustment by pharmacists in patients with chronic kidney disease in Japan: a web-based survey (vol 14, 615, 2014)
    Kondo, Yuki
    Ishitsuka, Yoichi
    Shigemori, Eri
    Irikura, Mitsuru
    Kadowaki, Daisuke
    Hirata, Sumio
    Maemura, Takeshi
    Irie, Tetsumi
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [19] Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study
    Leemans, Kathleen
    Cohen, Joachim
    Francke, Anneke L.
    Stichele, Robert Vander
    Claessen, Susanne J. J.
    Van den Block, Lieve
    Deliens, Luc
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2013, 12
  • [20] Use of quality indicators to evaluate the care of patients with localized prostate carcinoma
    Miller, DC
    Litwin, MS
    Sanda, MG
    Montie, JE
    Dunn, RL
    Resh, J
    Sandler, H
    Wei, JT
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (06) : 1428 - 1435