Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study

被引:2
作者
Sato, Noriko [1 ]
Fujita, Kenji [2 ,3 ]
Okada, Hiroshi [4 ]
Kushida, Kazuki [5 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Hlth Informat, Sch Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Showa Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Pharm, Tokyo, Japan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; GERIATRIC MEDICINE; Quality in health care; Health & safety; CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; OLDER-PEOPLE; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess measurement properties of 121 face and content validated quality indicators (QIs) for medication safety in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care. Design A mixed methods study: a 6-month observational study in primary care (July-December 2020) and in-depth semistructured online interviews with participants (February-March 2021). Setting Sixty community pharmacies in Japan. Participants Patients aged 75 years and older who were regularly taking six or more prescription medicines for >4 weeks were eligible. The observational study included 457 patients. The interviews were undertaken with 26 community pharmacists, including pharmacy managers and owners. Primary and secondary outcome measures Five measurement properties of QIs (applicability, improvement potential, acceptability, implementation issues and sensitivity to change) were evaluated. A web application was developed for data reporting and data visualisation. Results This study showed that 53 QIs met the measurement properties of applicability, improvement potential, acceptability and implementation issues. Of 53 QIs, 17 also had a high sensitivity to change. Interviews identified eight themes (indicator characteristics, web application, policy, patient, time, competence, pharmacy administration and collaboration) in relation to the consequence of implementation of QIs. Conclusions A set of 121 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was field tested for their five measurement properties. This QI set can be used to identify patients who may benefit from clinician reviews of their medicines. These QIs may be applied at different levels within the healthcare system: patient, pharmacy, regional and national levels. Further mechanisms to automatically collect and report data should be established to facilitate sustainable quality improvement initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Addington D, 2010, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V56, P1322
  • [2] Assessment of Quality Indicators for Appropriate Antibiotic Use
    Arcenillas, Paula
    Boix-Palop, Lucia
    Gomez, Lucia
    Xercavins, Mariona
    March, Pablo
    Martinez, Laura
    Riera, Montserrat
    Madridejos, Rosa
    Badia, Cristina
    Nicolas, Jordi
    Calbo, Esther
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (12)
  • [3] Application of drug-related problem (DRP) classification systems: a review of the literature
    Basger, Benjamin J.
    Moles, Rebekah J.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 70 (07) : 799 - 815
  • [4] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [5] Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
    Campbell, SM
    Braspenning, J
    Hutchinson, A
    Marshall, M
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (04): : 358 - 364
  • [6] Framework and indicator testing protocol for developing and piloting quality indicators for the UK quality and outcomes framework
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Hannon, Kerin
    Burke, Martyn
    Barber, Annette
    Lester, Helen E.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 12
  • [7] Donabedian A., 1980, Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Volume 1. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, V1
  • [8] Development and measurement of perioperative patient safety indicators
    Emond, Y. E.
    Stienen, J. J.
    Wollersheim, H. C.
    Bloo, G. J.
    Damen, J.
    Westert, G. P.
    Boermeester, M. A.
    Pols, M. A.
    Calsbeek, H.
    Wolff, A. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 114 (06) : 963 - 972
  • [9] American Geriatrics Society Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults
    Fick, Donna
    Semla, Todd
    Beizer, Judith
    Dombrowski, Robert
    Brandt, Nicole
    DuBeau, Catherine E.
    Flanagan, Nina
    Hanlon, Joseph
    Hollmann, Peter
    Linnebur, Sunny
    Nau, David
    Rehm, Bob
    Sandhu, Satinderpal
    Steinman, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (04) : 616 - 631
  • [10] Developing and testing a set of quality indicators for pharmacist home visit services: A mixed methods study in Japan
    Fujita, Kenji
    Kushida, Kazuki
    Okada, Hiroshi
    Moles, Rebekah J.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 87 (04) : 1940 - 1952