Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study

被引:6
作者
von Steinbuechel, Nicole [1 ]
Rauen, Katrin [2 ,3 ]
Covic, Amra [1 ]
Krenz, Ugne [1 ]
Bockhop, Fabian W. [1 ]
Mueller, Isabelle [1 ,4 ]
Cunitz, Katrin [1 ]
Polinder, Suzanne [5 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout [5 ,6 ]
Vester, Johannes [7 ]
Zeldovich, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Psychiat Hosp Zurich, Dept Geriatr Psychiat, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp, Inst Stroke & Dementia Res, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
[4] Columbia Univ Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Publ Hlth, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] idv Data Anal & Study Planning, Dept Biometry & Clin Res, Gauting, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; POST-CONCUSSION SYMPTOMS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEAD-INJURY; DEPRESSION; MILD; SEVERITY; QOLIBRI;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0280796
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can negatively impact patients' lives on many dimensions. Multiple instruments are available for evaluating TBI outcomes, but it is still unclear which instruments are the most sensitive for that purpose. This study examines the sensitivity of nine outcome instruments in terms of their ability to discriminate within and between specific patient groups, selected a priori as identified from the literature, at three different time points within a year after TBI (i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months post injury). The sensitivity of the instruments to sociodemographic (sex, age, education), premorbid (psychological health status), and injury-related (clinical care pathways, TBI and extracranial injury severity) factors was assessed by means of cross-sectional multivariate Wei-Lachin analyses. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)-the standard in the field of TBI for measuring functional recovery-demonstrated the highest sensitivity in most group comparisons. However, as single functional scale, it may not be able to reflect the multidimensional nature of the outcome. Therefore, the GOSE was used as a reference for further sensitivity analyses on more specific outcome scales, addressing further potential deficits following TBI. The physical component summary score (PCS) of the generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments (SF-36v2/-12v2) and the TBI-specific HRQOL instruments (QOLIBRI/-OS) were most sensitive in distinguishing recovery after TBI across all time points and patient groups, followed by the RPQ assessing post-concussion symptoms and the PHQ-9 measuring depression. The SF-36v2/-12v2 mental component summary score and the GAD-7 measuring anxiety were less sensitive in several group comparisons. The assessment of the functional recovery status combined with generic HRQOL (the PCS of the SF-12v2), disease-specific HRQOL (QOLIBRI-OS), and post-concussion symptoms (RPQ) can provide a sensitive, comprehensive, yet time-efficient evaluation of the health status of individuals after TBI in different patient groups.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Problems in functioning after a mild traumatic brain injury within the ICF framework: the patient perspective using focus groups
    Sveen, Unni
    Ostensjo, Sigrid
    Laxe, Sara
    Soberg, Helene L.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (09) : 749 - 757
  • [42] Prevalence and correlates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults: results from the Well-being of the Singapore Elderly (WiSE) study
    Cetty, Laxman
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Vaingankar, Janhavi Ajit
    Jeyagurunathan, Anitha
    Chua, Boon Yiang
    Picco, Louisa
    Prince, Martin
    Chong, Siow Ann
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2017, 29 (11) : 1899 - 1907
  • [43] Prospective observational cohort study on epidemiology, treatment and outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in German BG hospitals
    Schwenkreis, Peter
    Gonschorek, Andreas
    Berg, Florian
    Meier, Ullrich
    Rogge, Witold
    Schmehl, Ingo
    Kern, Bodo Christian
    Meisel, Hans-Joerg
    Wohlfarth, Kai
    Gross, Stefan
    Sczesny-Kaiser, Matthias
    Tegenthoff, Martin
    Boschert, Juergen
    Bruckmoser, Ralf
    Fuerst, Andrea
    Schaan, Marc
    Strowitzki, Martin
    Pingel, Andreas
    Jaegers, Lisa Linnea
    Rudolf, Henrik
    Trampisch, Hans-Joachim
    Lemcke, Johannes
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [44] Global Outcome and Late Seizures After Penetrating Versus Closed Traumatic Brain Injury: A NIDRR TBI Model Systems Study
    Walker, William C.
    Ketchum, James S., III
    Marwitz, Jennifer H.
    Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie A.
    McClish, Donna K.
    Bushnik, Tamara
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2015, 30 (04) : 231 - 240
  • [45] Prevalence of traumatic brain injury and epilepsy among prisoners in France: Results of the Fleury TBI study
    Durand, E.
    Watier, L.
    Fix, M.
    Weiss, J. J.
    Chevignard, M.
    Pradat-Diehl, P.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (04) : 363 - 372
  • [46] Latent Profile Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Cognitive Function of Adults 2 Weeks After Traumatic Brain Injury Findings From the TRACK-TBI Study
    Brett, Benjamin L.
    Kramer, Mark D.
    Whyte, John
    McCrea, Michael A.
    Stein, Murray B.
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    Sherer, Mark
    Markowitz, Amy J.
    Manley, Geoffrey T.
    Nelson, Lindsay D.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (03)
  • [47] Objective and Subjective Burden of Informal Caregivers 4 Years After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results From the PariS-TBI Study
    Bayen, Eleonore
    Jourdan, Claire
    Ghout, Idir
    Darnoux, Emmanuelle
    Azerad, Sylvie
    Vallat-Azouvi, Claire
    Weiss, Jean-Jacques
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Pradat-Diehl, Pascale
    Joel, Marie-Eve
    Azouvi, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2016, 31 (05) : E59 - E67
  • [48] Early systemic insults following traumatic brain injury: association with biomarker profiles, therapy for intracranial hypertension, and neurological outcomes-an analysis of CENTER-TBI data
    Robba, Chiara
    Graziano, Francesca
    Picetti, Edoardo
    Akerlund, Cecilia
    Addis, Alberto
    Pastore, Giuseppe
    Sivero, Mattia
    Rebora, Paola
    Galimberti, Stefania
    Stocchetti, Nino
    Maas, Andrew
    Menon, David K.
    Citerio, Giuseppe
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 50 (03) : 371 - 384
  • [49] An independently validated nomogram for individualised estimation of short-term mortality risk among patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a modelling analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry Study
    Lang, Lijian
    Wang, Tianwei
    Xie, Li
    Yang, Chun
    Skudder-Hill, Loren
    Jiang, Jiyao
    Gao, Guoyi
    Feng, Junfeng
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2023, 59
  • [50] Early predictors of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (UPFRONT): an observational cohort study
    van der Naalt, Joukje
    Timmerman, Marieke E.
    de Koning, Myrthe E.
    van der Horn, Harm J.
    Scheenen, Myrthe E.
    Jacobs, Bram
    Hageman, Gerard
    Yilmaz, Tansel
    Roks, Gerwin
    Spikman, Jacoba M.
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (07) : 532 - 540