Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study

被引:6
作者
von Steinbuechel, Nicole [1 ]
Rauen, Katrin [2 ,3 ]
Covic, Amra [1 ]
Krenz, Ugne [1 ]
Bockhop, Fabian W. [1 ]
Mueller, Isabelle [1 ,4 ]
Cunitz, Katrin [1 ]
Polinder, Suzanne [5 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout [5 ,6 ]
Vester, Johannes [7 ]
Zeldovich, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Psychiat Hosp Zurich, Dept Geriatr Psychiat, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp, Inst Stroke & Dementia Res, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
[4] Columbia Univ Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Publ Hlth, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] idv Data Anal & Study Planning, Dept Biometry & Clin Res, Gauting, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; POST-CONCUSSION SYMPTOMS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEAD-INJURY; DEPRESSION; MILD; SEVERITY; QOLIBRI;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0280796
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can negatively impact patients' lives on many dimensions. Multiple instruments are available for evaluating TBI outcomes, but it is still unclear which instruments are the most sensitive for that purpose. This study examines the sensitivity of nine outcome instruments in terms of their ability to discriminate within and between specific patient groups, selected a priori as identified from the literature, at three different time points within a year after TBI (i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months post injury). The sensitivity of the instruments to sociodemographic (sex, age, education), premorbid (psychological health status), and injury-related (clinical care pathways, TBI and extracranial injury severity) factors was assessed by means of cross-sectional multivariate Wei-Lachin analyses. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)-the standard in the field of TBI for measuring functional recovery-demonstrated the highest sensitivity in most group comparisons. However, as single functional scale, it may not be able to reflect the multidimensional nature of the outcome. Therefore, the GOSE was used as a reference for further sensitivity analyses on more specific outcome scales, addressing further potential deficits following TBI. The physical component summary score (PCS) of the generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments (SF-36v2/-12v2) and the TBI-specific HRQOL instruments (QOLIBRI/-OS) were most sensitive in distinguishing recovery after TBI across all time points and patient groups, followed by the RPQ assessing post-concussion symptoms and the PHQ-9 measuring depression. The SF-36v2/-12v2 mental component summary score and the GAD-7 measuring anxiety were less sensitive in several group comparisons. The assessment of the functional recovery status combined with generic HRQOL (the PCS of the SF-12v2), disease-specific HRQOL (QOLIBRI-OS), and post-concussion symptoms (RPQ) can provide a sensitive, comprehensive, yet time-efficient evaluation of the health status of individuals after TBI in different patient groups.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Antithrombotic Agents on Radiological Lesion Progression in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis
    Mathieu, Francois
    Gueting, Helge
    Gravesteijn, Benjamin
    Monteiro, Miguel
    Ben Glocker
    Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N.
    Kamnistas, Konstantinos
    Robertson, Claudia S.
    Levin, Harvey
    Whitehouse, Daniel P.
    Das, Tilak
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Maegele, Marc
    Newcombe, Virginia F. J.
    Menon, David K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2020, 37 (19) : 2069 - 2080
  • [32] Longitudinal outcome and recovery of social problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI): Contribution of brain insult and family environment
    Ryan, Nicholas P.
    van Bijnen, Loeka
    Catroppa, Cathy
    Beauchamp, Miriam H.
    Crossley, Louise
    Hearps, Stephen
    Anderson, Vicki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 49 : 23 - 30
  • [33] Predictors of Informal Care Burden 1 Year After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results From the PariS-TBI study
    Bayen, Eleonore
    Pradat-Diehl, Pascale
    Jourdan, Claire
    Ghout, Idir
    Bosserelle, Vanessa
    Azerad, Sylvie
    Weiss, Jean-Jacques
    Joel, Marie-Eve
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Azouvi, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2013, 28 (06) : 408 - 418
  • [34] Symptom Frequency and Persistence in the First Year after Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study
    Machamer, Joan
    Temkin, Nancy
    Dikmen, Sureyya
    Nelson, Lindsay D.
    Barber, Jason
    Hwang, Phillip
    Boase, Kim
    Stein, Murray B.
    Sun, Xiaoying
    Giacino, Joseph
    McCrea, Michael A.
    Taylor, Sabrina R.
    Jain, Sonia
    Manley, Geoff
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2022, 39 (5-6) : 358 - 370
  • [35] Self-awareness four years after severe traumatic brain injury: discordance between the patient's and relative's complaints. Results from the PariS-TBI study
    Chesnel, Camille
    Jourdan, Claire
    Bayen, Eleonore
    Ghout, Idir
    Darnoux, Emmanuelle
    Azerad, Sylvie
    Charanton, James
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Pradat-Diehl, Pascale
    Ruet, Alexis
    Azouvi, Philippe
    Vallat-Azouvi, Claire
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (05) : 692 - 704
  • [36] Imaging Findings in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element-Based Pictorial Review and Analysis of Over 4000 Admission Brain Computed Tomography Scans from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study
    Vande Vyvere, Thijs
    Pisica, Dana
    Wilms, Guido
    Claes, Lene
    Van Dyck, Pieter
    Snoeckx, Annemiek
    van den Hauwe, Luc
    Pullens, Pim
    Verheyden, Jan
    Wintermark, Max
    Dekeyzer, Sven
    Mac Donald, Christine L.
    Maas, Andrew I. R.
    Parizel, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2024, 41 (19-20) : 2248 - 2297
  • [37] Family Needs After Traumatic Brain Injury: A VA TBI Model Systems Study
    Finn, Jacob A.
    Klocksieben, Farina A.
    Smith, Austin N.
    Bernstein, John
    O'Neil-Pirozzi, Therese M.
    Kreutzer, Jeff S.
    Sander, Angelle M.
    Dreer, Laura E.
    Niemeier, Janet P.
    Cotner, Bridget A.
    Nakase-Richardson, Risa
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2022, 37 (06) : 327 - 337
  • [38] Negative impact of litigation procedures on patient outcomes four years after severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-traumatic brain injury study
    Bayen, Eleonore
    Jourdan, Claire
    Ghout, Idir
    Pradat-Diehl, Pascale
    Darnoux, Emmanuelle
    Nelson, Gaelle
    Vallat-Azouvi, Claire
    Charenton, James
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Ruet, Alexis
    Azouvi, Philippe
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (17) : 2040 - 2047
  • [39] Early Detection of Poor Outcome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Predictive Factors Using a Multidimensional Approach a Pilot Study
    Caplain, Sophie
    Blancho, Sophie
    Marque, Sebastien
    Montreuil, Michele
    Aghakhani, Nozar
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [40] Quality management in traumatic brain injury (TBI) Lessons from the prospective study in 6.800 patients after acute TBI in respect of neurorehabilitation
    von Wild, KRH
    Wenzlaff, P
    RE-ENGINEERING OF THE DAMAGED BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD: EVIDENCE-BASED NEUROREHABILITATION, 2005, 93 : 15 - 25