The Association of Anesthesia Type and Neonatal Outcomes Following Category-1 Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:1
作者
Skoog, Carl M. [1 ]
Katzer, Joel F. [1 ]
Wendt, Linder H. [2 ]
Ituk, Unyime [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Inst Clin & Translat Res, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Anesthesia, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
apgar score; umbilical arterial ph; epidural anesthesia; general anesthesia; cesarean delivery; MANAGEMENT; ANALGESIA; CONTACT; SECTION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.35910
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Neuraxial anesthesia is the preferred anesthesia technique for cesarean delivery due to a decreased risk of adverse events. However, general anesthesia is often employed during emergent cesarean deliveries to achieve a shorter decision-to-delivery interval. The objective of this study was to determine if the conversion of epidural labor analgesia to surgical anesthesia for a category-1 cesarean delivery is associated with significant neonatal morbidity. Study design This was a retrospective cohort study of all intrapartum category-1 cesarean deliveries performed at an academic tertiary care institution between August 2016 and July 2021. The primary outcome was neonatal morbidity, defined as a composite of neonatal umbilical artery pH < 7.10 and/or 5???min Apgar score < 7, and/or neonatal intensive care unit admission. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for the presence of covariates and examine the degree to which they influenced the outcome. Results A total of 185 mother-neonate pairs qualified for inclusion, of which 23 had cesarean delivery under general anesthesia and 162 under epidural anesthesia. There was no significant difference in adverse neonatal outcomes between category-1 cesarean deliveries done under general anesthesia compared to epidural anesthesia (47% vs 35%, p = 0.3). The incidence of umbilical arterial pH < 7.10 was higher in the general anesthesia group compared to the epidural anesthesia group (35% vs 12%, p = 0.018). The multivariate regression model showed that gestational age (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.51-0.75, p = <0.001) and non-reassuring fetal heart trace (OR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.05-0.58, p = 0.005) were significant predictors of adverse neonatal outcome. Conclusion Our results suggest that the conversion of epidural analgesia to surgical anesthesia for category-1 cesarean delivery in women with a functional labor epidural catheter is not associated with poorer neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Wiskott Kenas, 2020, Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care, V27, P6, DOI 10.2478/rjaic-2020-0012