Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences

被引:5
|
作者
Woodside, Audra J. [1 ]
Weber, Peter M. [1 ]
Williard, Paul G. [1 ]
Morton, Charles I. [1 ]
Colvin, Vicki L. [1 ]
Robinson, Jerome R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Chem, Providence, RI 02912 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Upper-Division Undergraduate; Graduate Education; Research; Cheminformatics; Communication; Writing; Organometallics; ORGANIC-CHEMISTRY; WRITING ASSIGNMENT; SCIENCE; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to general audiences receives much less attention. Although numerous initiatives work to close this gap, many have logistical or financial barriers that make them difficult to integrate in a large classroom setting. Herein, we present an assignment focused on improving advanced students' (i.e., graduate and advanced undergraduate students) ability to communicate current organometallic chemistry research (i.e., technical information) to a general audience using infographics. Our assignment features a unique, iterative feedback model incorporating instructor, peer, and near-peer (general audience) groups to provide students with multiple opportunities to refine their communication skills. Anonymous student self-assessments of advanced undergraduate/ graduate students (infographic creators and peer reviewers) and first year, non-major undergraduate students (near-peer reviewers and general audience) indicate that the assignment led to (i) increased confidence in communication skills (advanced undergraduate/graduate students), (ii) a broadened understanding of advanced chemistry in everyday life (both), and (iii) increased recognition for the importance of scientific communication to different audiences (both). Reflections on student outcomes as well as recommendations and considerations for instructors are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1917 / 1925
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Does regular attendance in supplemental virtual near-peer tutoring in anatomy laboratory content improve anatomy performance for medical students?
    Doty, Julie E.
    Thompson, Nathan E.
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 17 (03) : 455 - 461
  • [22] Pre-assessment and peer tutoring as measures to improve performance in gateway general chemistry classes
    Allenbaugh, R. J.
    Herrera, K. M.
    CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 15 (04) : 620 - 627
  • [23] Developing Technical Writing Skills in the Physical Chemistry Laboratory: A Progressive Approach Employing Peer Review
    Gragson, Derek E.
    Hagen, John P.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 87 (01) : 62 - 65
  • [24] The influence of near-peer teaching on undergraduate health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs: A systematic integrative review
    Pierce, Beth
    van de Mortel, Thea
    Allen, Jeanne
    Mitchell, Creina
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 143
  • [25] Implementation of a peer review program using the validatedDIET-COMMStool to assess dietitians' communication skills in the workplace
    Notaras, Stephanie
    Smythe, Kylie
    Mak, May
    Whitehead, Kirsten
    NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2021, 78 (03) : 324 - 332
  • [26] The 3-D Skills Model: a Randomised Controlled Pilot Study Comparing a Novel 1-1 Near-Peer Teaching Model to a Formative OSCE with Self-regulated Practice
    Robertson, C.
    Al-Moasseb, Z.
    Noonan, Z.
    Boyle, J. G.
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2021, 31 (06) : 1789 - 1801
  • [27] Enhancing Scientific Communication Skills: a Real-World Simulation in a Tertiary-Level Life Science Class Using E-Learning Technology in Biomedical Literature Perception, Reflective Review Writing on a Clinical Issue, and Self and Peer Assessments
    Eppler, Elisabeth
    Meyer, Jan
    Serowy, Steffen
    Link, Karl
    Pauk, Barbara
    Filgueira, Luis
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2021, 51 (02) : 277 - 299