A mapping approach to surface hopping

被引:35
作者
Mannouch, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Richardson, Jeremy O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Lab Phys Chem, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ELECTRONICALLY NONADIABATIC DYNAMICS; INITIAL-VALUE REPRESENTATION; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; SEMICLASSICAL DESCRIPTION; CLASSICAL-MODELS; FEWEST-SWITCHES; FREEDOM; DECOHERENCE; ULTRAFAST; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1063/5.0139734
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We present a nonadiabatic classical-trajectory approach that offers the best of both worlds between fewest-switches surface hopping (FSSH) and quasiclassical mapping dynamics. This mapping approach to surface hopping (MASH) propagates the nuclei on the active adiabatic potential-energy surface, such as in FSSH. However, unlike in FSSH, transitions between active surfaces are deterministic and occur when the electronic mapping variables evolve between specified regions of the electronic phase space. This guarantees internal consistency between the active surface and the electronic degrees of freedom throughout the dynamics. MASH is rigorously derivable from exact quantum mechanics as a limit of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE), leading to a unique prescription for momentum rescaling and frustrated hops. Hence, a quantum-jump procedure can, in principle, be used to systematically converge the accuracy of the results to that of the QCLE. This jump procedure also provides a rigorous framework for deriving approximate decoherence corrections similar to those proposed for FSSH. We apply MASH to simulate the nonadiabatic dynamics in various model systems and show that it consistently produces more accurate results than FSSH at a comparable computational cost.(c) 2023 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [1] An exact-factorization perspective on quantum-classical approaches to excited-state dynamics
    Agostini, Federica
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2018, 91 (07)
  • [2] Quantum-Classical Nonadiabatic Dynamics: Coupled- vs Independent-Trajectory Methods
    Agostini, Federica
    Min, Seung Kyu
    Abedi, Ali
    Gross, E. K. U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2016, 12 (05) : 2127 - 2143
  • [3] A LOG-DERIVATIVE PROPAGATION SCHEME FOR THE EXACT SOLUTION OF 2-STATE CURVE CROSSING PROBLEMS
    ALEXANDER, MH
    PARLANT, G
    HEMMER, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 91 (04) : 2388 - 2395
  • [4] On detailed balance in nonadiabatic dynamics: From spin spheres to equilibrium ellipsoids
    Amati, Graziano
    Runeson, Johan E.
    Richardson, Jeremy O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 158 (06)
  • [5] Quasiclassical approaches to the generalized quantum master equation
    Amati, Graziano
    Saller, Maximilian A. C.
    Kelly, Aaron
    Richardson, Jeremy O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 157 (23)
  • [6] Mapping variable ring polymer molecular dynamics: A path-integral based method for nonadiabatic processes
    Ananth, Nandini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 139 (12)
  • [7] Semiclassical description of electronically nonadiabatic dynamics via the initial value representation
    Ananth, Nandini
    Venkataraman, Charulatha
    Miller, William H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 127 (08)
  • [8] Large-Scale Quantum Dynamics with Matrix Product States
    Baiardi, Alberto
    Reiher, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2019, 15 (06) : 3481 - 3498
  • [9] Newton-X: a surface-hopping program for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics
    Barbatti, Mario
    Ruckenbauer, Matthias
    Plasser, Felix
    Pittner, Jiri
    Granucci, Giovanni
    Persico, Maurizio
    Lischka, Hans
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2014, 4 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [10] Nonadiabatic dynamics with trajectory surface hopping method
    Barbatti, Mario
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2011, 1 (04) : 620 - 633