Assessing structure and level of virtue in the Chinese "Code" for moral education: Bifactor model and item response theory analysis

被引:2
作者
Huo, Yan [1 ]
Xie, Jin [1 ]
Ding, Cody [2 ]
Kristjansson, Kristjan [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Ctr Youth Moral Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Educ Sci & Profess Programs, 404 Marillac Hall, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Educ, Jubilee Ctr Character & Virtues, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Moral character virtues; The chinese "Code; Chinese moral education; Bifactor model; Item response theory; STRENGTHS VIA-IS; ACTION INVENTORY; CHARACTER STRENGTHS; DIMENSIONALITY; VALUES; VALIDITY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-022-02757-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The main purpose of the current study was to investigate the structure or dimensionality of the official Chinese Code for Primary and Secondary-School Students as well as the "moral-character salience level" that the 35 Code items assess. Although the Code can be perceived as a major aspirational behavior document for students to follow, no previous evidence has analyzed the structure of the Code instrument and what level of moral character the Code items are likely to assess. Such a lack of psychometric analysis hinders the effective discussion and communication of the Code in the moral-education literature, nationally and internationally. Based on factor and bifactor models, our findings demonstrated that the 35 Code items do have a unidimensional structure, dominated with a general factor, and reveal the salience level of the items, which could offer practical implications for a potential revision of the Code. We also relate our discussion to the structural analysis of the positive psychological VIA-instruments, in order to advance cross-cultural dialogue on measures of Chinese and Western moral education.
引用
收藏
页码:15782 / 15796
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Allport GW, 1937, PERSONALITY PSYCHOL
[2]  
An, 2016, ED SCI RES, V000
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BASE SAS 94 PROCEDUR, DOI DOI 10.1016/0370-2693(82)91293-X
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X
[5]   Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates [J].
Brdar, Ingrid ;
Kashdan, Todd B. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2010, 44 (01) :151-154
[6]  
Chen WH, 1997, J EDUC BEHAV STAT, V22, P265, DOI 10.3102/10769986022003265
[7]   Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history [J].
Dahlsgaard, K ;
Peterson, C ;
Seligman, MEP .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 9 (03) :203-213
[8]  
Duan, 2020, 3 DIMENSIONAL CHARAC
[9]  
Embretson S. E., 2000, Item response theory for psychologists
[10]   The Emerging Science of Virtue [J].
Fowers, Blaine J. ;
Carroll, Jason S. ;
Leonhardt, Nathan D. ;
Cokelet, Bradford .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01) :118-147