The creation of a nudging protocol to support online student engagement in higher education

被引：19

作者：

Brown, Alice ^{[1
]}

Lawrence, Jill ^{[2
]}

Basson, Marita

Axelsen, Megan

Redmond, Petrea

Turner, Joanna ^{[3
]}

Maloney, Suzanne

Galligan, Linda ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Early Childhood Educ, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia

[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Humanities & Commun, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia

[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Phys, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia

[4] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Educ, West St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia

来源：

ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION | 2023年 / 24卷 / 03期

关键词：

higher education; nudge analytics; nudge protocol; student engagement;

D O I：

10.1177/14697874211039077

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Combining nudge theory with learning analytics, 'nudge analytics', is a relatively recent phenomenon in the educational context. Used, for example, to address such issues as concerns with student (dis)engagement, nudging students to take certain action or to change a behaviour towards active learning, can make a difference. However, knowing who to nudge, how to nudge or when to nudge can be a challenge. Providing students with strategic, sensitive nudges that help to move them forward is almost an art form. It requires not only technical skills to use appropriate software and interpret data, but careful consideration of what to say and how to say it. In this article a nudge protocol is presented that can be used in online courses to encourage student engagement with key course resources that are integral to supporting their learning.

引用

页码：257 / 271

页数：15

共 37 条

[1]

Beer C., 2010, P ASCILITE SYDNEY, P75

[2]

Blumenstein M., 2019, Learning analytics in the classroom: Translating learning analytics research for teachers, P185

[3]

Bodily R., 2017, Educational Technology, V57, P10

[4] A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education [J].

Brown, Alice ;

Lawrence, Jill ;

Basson, Marita ;

Redmond, Petrea .

HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 41 (02) :284-299

[5]

Burton LJ., 2015, Myths in Education, Learning and Teaching, P151, DOI 10.1057/9781137476982_9

[6] From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes [J].

Carless, David .

ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (02) :143-153

[7] Online module login data as a proxy measure of student engagement: the case of myUnisa, MoyaMA, Flipgrid, and Gephi at an ODeL institution in South Africa [J].

Chaka, Chaka ;

Nkhobo, Tlatso .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 16 (01)

[8] Strengthening student engagement: what do students want in online courses? [J].

Chakraborty, Misha ;

Nafukho, Fredrick Muyia .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 38 (09) :782-802

[9]

Corrigan Owen, 2015, Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. 10th European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2015. Proceedings: LNCS 9307, P42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_4

[10] An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments [J].

Czerkawski B.C. ;

Lyman E.W., III .

TechTrends, 2016, 60 (6) :532-539

← 1 2 3 4 →