Property Institutions and State Capacity: A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Agricultural Projects in Zambia

被引:0
作者
Yang, Yuezhou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Fudan Global Publ Policy Hub, London, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Fudan Global Publ Policy Hub, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
China in Africa; agricultural investment; African state capacity; property institutions; land; SCALE LAND ACQUISITIONS; GOVERNANCE; INVESTMENTS; POWER; PATTERNS; ETHIOPIA; ACCESS; DEALS; GRAB;
D O I
10.1080/00220388.2024.2328034
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
A long-standing literature argues that African states have weak capacity, especially in regulating land. Increasingly, scholarly work on foreign land acquisition in developing countries recognizes that the African states and subnational actors have played an important and diverse role in (re)structuring access and control over land and natural resources. I contribute to this scholarship by focusing on the role of African property institutions and propose a land tenure regime theory as the mechanism through which foreign agricultural projects and African state capacity interact. By process-tracing three Chinese agricultural projects in Zambia as typical cases, I show that Zambian state structures investment strategies of Chinese investors through different configurations of rule of land access, transfer and control in each LTR. Furthermore, Zambian state capacity in enforcing contract and projecting infrastructural power can be reinforced or tested through investing CAgriIs in different LTRs. My findings challenge the 'weak state' argument and raise important questions of how African governments should approach rural development on customary land.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1199
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Resource frontiers and agglomeration economies: The varied logics of transnational land-based investing in Southern and Eastern Africa
    Abeygunawardane, Dilini
    Garcia, Angela Kronenburg
    Sun, Zhanli
    Mueller, Daniel
    Sitoe, Almeida
    Meyfroidt, Patrick
    [J]. AMBIO, 2022, 51 (06) : 1535 - 1551
  • [2] Alston LeeJ., 2008, Handbook of New Institutional Economics, P573
  • [3] Anseeuw W., 2011, Land Rights and the Rush for Land
  • [4] What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?
    Arezki, Rabah
    Deininger, Klaus
    Selod, Harris
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 29 (02) : 207 - 233
  • [5] Baldarelli M., 2018, LARGE SCALE LAND ACQ
  • [6] Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and Public Goods Provision in Zambia
    Baldwin, Kate
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (04) : 794 - 809
  • [7] Barton SJ, 2016, PALG STUD HIST FINAN, P1
  • [8] Struggles over Land and Authority in Africa
    Berry, Sara
    [J]. AFRICAN STUDIES REVIEW, 2017, 60 (03) : 105 - 125
  • [9] Land tenure regimes and state structure in rural Africa: implications for forms of resistance to large-scale land acquisitions by outsiders
    Boone, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY AFRICAN STUDIES, 2015, 33 (02) : 171 - 190
  • [10] Boone Catherine., 2014, PROPERTY POLITICAL O, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139629256, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139629256]