A new perspective on the US energy efficiency: The political context

被引:7
作者
Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio [1 ]
Neves, Juliana Campos [1 ]
Carneiro Elmor, Larissa Rosa [1 ]
Reis De Araujo, Michel Fontaine [1 ]
Wanke, Peter Fernandes [1 ]
Tan, Yong [2 ]
机构
[1] FGV EBAPE, Edificio Roberto Campos,R Jorn Orlando Dantas 30, BR-22231010 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Bradford, Richmond Rd, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Energy efficiency; United States; DEA; Political context; INNOVATION EFFICIENCY; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; ECONOMIC INTERESTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNITED-STATES; DEA; CONSUMPTION; CHINA; EMISSIONS; BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122093
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper offers a new perspective on the energy efficiency literature by bringing evidence of political contextual factors as the predictors of energy efficiency. Specifically, we posit that the Democrat administration is more energy-efficient considering the reduction of environmental impact, in contrast, the Republican administration is more efficient considering only financial expenditures leading to the production of economic growth. In addition, we predict that political administration tenure is negatively correlated with green energy efficiency and that political distancing moderates the relationship between political party administration and energy efficiency. This study sheds light on these matters by performing an efficiency analysis of fifty North American states through a bootstrap DEA non-parametric model, followed by Tobit regressions to evaluate our hypotheses concerning the effect of the contextual factors on the calculated efficiency scores.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   The ineffectiveness of efficiency: The paradoxical effects of state policy on energy consumption in the United States [J].
Adua, Lazarus ;
Clark, Brett ;
York, Richard .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 71
[3]   Politics and Corporate-Sector Environmentally Significant Actions: The Effects of Political Partisanship on US Utilities Energy Efficiency Policies [J].
Adua, Lazarus ;
Clark, Brett .
REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (01) :31-48
[4]   Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap? [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Greenstone, Michael .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (01) :3-28
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Diversity and Discovery: Mapping Civil Society Organizations in the Philippines
[6]  
Arnold P.A., 2004, About America How the United States is Governed
[7]   Energy efficiency drivers in South Africa: 1965-2014 [J].
Aye, Goodness C. ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Wanke, Peter .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (06) :1465-1482
[8]   Influence of coal as an energy source on environmental pollution [J].
Balat, M. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2007, 29 (07) :581-589
[9]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[10]   Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? [J].
Chandler, Jess .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (08) :3274-3281