Attitudes of Maternal Fetal Medicine specialists on prenatal diagnosis, disability and termination

被引:1
作者
Sallam, Aminah [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Gazzola, Marina Gaeta [1 ,6 ]
Merriam, Audrey A. [2 ]
Mercurio, Mark [3 ]
Drago, Matthew J. [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Dept Genet, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] POB 208063, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 110 Francis St, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] NYC Hlth & Hosp Bellevue Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, NYU Langone, 462 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[7] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Pediat, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
SSM-QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH | 2023年 / 3卷
关键词
Maternal fetal medicine; Prenatal; Genetic counseling; Disability; Termination; DOWN-SYNDROME; PERSPECTIVES; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100232
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the key attitudes and opinions of Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialists (MFMs) who counsel expectant mothers with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomaly surrounding prenatal genetic testing, disability and termination.Methods: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with MFMs across the United States. Participants were recruited through the snowball method beginning with referrals from the MFM on our study team, AM. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed for themes using modified grounded theory by three reviewers.Results: 2227 codes from 17 interviews were grouped into 18 themes, which were then characterized into six overarching, topic-oriented clusters: 1) Physician Methodology; 2) Physician Perception of Disability; 3) Physician Experience; 4) Physician-Patient Relationship; 5) Patient Experience; and 6) Termination. Patients' misunderstanding of prenatal genetic screening, diagnostic technology, the implications of certain genetic anomalies, and limited time to explain these factors were identified as major barriers to effective counseling. All MFMs described themselves as informants in the prenatal diagnostic process, and all offered their patients termination following a diagnosis of a severe or lethal congenital anomaly; however, MFMs did not identify a consistent definition of severe or lethal congenital anomaly. MFMs reported fears of being perceived as coercive by patients and a high degree of moral and emotional distress during consultations. Finally, MFMs identified legal, financial and structural barriers that prevented patients from accessing prenatal genetic diagnostic services and termination services. It was felt that these limitations ultimately inhibited autonomous decision making by patients.Conclusions: These findings highlight important barriers faced by MFM providers when trying to provide effective counseling to expectant mothers carrying a prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Further exploration of these identified barriers may lead to the development of strategies to improve prenatal counseling.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Exploring issues relating to disability cultural competence among practicing physicians
    Agaronnik, Nicole
    Campbell, Eric G.
    Ressalam, Julie
    Iezzoni, Lisa I.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 12 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [2] A first look at women's perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing to detect sex chromosome aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes
    Agatisa, Patricia K.
    Mercer, Mary Beth
    Leek, Angela C.
    Smith, Marissa B.
    Philipson, Elliot
    Farrell, Ruth M.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (07) : 692 - 698
  • [3] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice BulletinsObstetrics, 2020, Obstet. Gynecol, V136, pe48, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000004084, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004084]
  • [4] Prenatally diagnosed fetal conditions in the age of fetal care: does who counsels matter?
    Brown, Stephen D.
    Ecker, Jeffrey L.
    Ward, Johanna R. M.
    Halpern, Elkan F.
    Sayeed, Sadath A.
    Buchmiller, Terry L.
    Mitchell, Christine
    Donelan, Karen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (05) : 409.e1 - 409.e11
  • [5] Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences
    Cernat, Alexandra
    De Freitas, Chante
    Majid, Umair
    Trivedi, Forum
    Higgins, Caroline
    Vanstone, Meredith
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [6] Corbin J., 2008, Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
  • [7] Constructing a Culturally Informed Spanish Decision-Aid to Counsel Latino Parents Facing Imminent Extreme Premature Delivery
    Drago, Matthew J.
    Guillen, Ursula
    Schiaratura, Maria
    Batza, Jennifer
    Zygmunt, Annette
    Mowes, Anja
    Munson, David
    Lorenz, John M.
    Farkouh-Karoleski, Christiana
    Kirpalani, Haresh
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2018, 22 (07) : 950 - 957
  • [8] It's More Than a Blood Test: Patients' Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
    Farrell, Ruth M.
    Mercer, Mary Beth
    Agatisa, Patricia K.
    Smith, Marissa B.
    Philipson, Elliot
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (02): : 614 - 631
  • [9] Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections
    Floyd, Erin
    Allyse, Megan A.
    Michie, Marsha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2016, 25 (05) : 965 - 977
  • [10] Gammon B L, 2016, Ethics Med Public Health, V2, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.jemep.2016.07.006