ChatGPT for assessment writing

被引:32
作者
Zuckerman, Matthew [1 ,4 ]
Flood, Ryan [1 ]
Tan, Rachael J. B. [1 ]
Kelp, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Ecker, David J. [1 ]
Menke, Jonathan [1 ]
Lockspeiser, Tai [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Pathol, Ft Collins, CO USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Dept Pediat, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado Denver, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
Assessment; artificial intelligence; AI; ChatGPT; medical education;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249239
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
What is the educational challenge?Medical schools invest significant resources into the creation of multiple-choice items for assessments. This process is costly and requires faculty training. Recently ChatGPT has been used in various areas to improve content creation efficiency, and it has otherwise been used to answer USMLE-style assessment items.What are the proposed solutions?We proposed the use of ChatGPT to create initial drafts of multiple-choice items.What are the potential benefits to a wider global audience?The use of ChatGPT to generate assessment items can decrease resources required, allowing for the creation of more items, and freeing-up faculty time to perform higher level assessment activities. ChatGPT is also able to consistently produce items using a standard format while adhering to item writing guidelines, which can be very challenging for faculty teams.What are the next steps?We plan to pilot ChatGPT drafted questions and compare item statistics for those written by ChatGPT with those written by our content experts. We also plan to further identify the types of questions that ChatGPT is most appropriate for, and incorporate media into assessment items (e.g. images, videos).
引用
收藏
页码:1224 / 1227
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] AAMC, 2021, ASS METH MED SCH
  • [2] Billings MS., 2020, NBME ITEM WRITING GU
  • [3] ChatGPT in medical school: how successful is AI in progress testing?
    Friederichs, Hendrik
    Friederichs, Wolf Jonas
    Maerz, Maren
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2023, 28 (01):
  • [4] Gilson Aidan, 2023, JMIR Med Educ, V9, pe45312, DOI 10.2196/45312
  • [5] The quality of in-house medical school examinations
    Jozefowicz, RF
    Koeppen, BM
    Case, S
    Galbraith, R
    Swanson, D
    Glew, RH
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (02) : 156 - 161
  • [6] Wilkinson D., 2023, OXFORD REV