Greenhouse gas emissions from hybrid energy storage systems in future 100% renewable power systems-A Swedish case based on consequential life cycle assessment

被引:27
|
作者
Jiao, Yang [1 ]
Mansson, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Electromagnet Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Consequential life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas emissions; Hybrid energy storage system; Renewable power system; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; LEVELIZED COST; BATTERIES; TECHNOLOGIES; INTEGRATION; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2022.106167
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
To promote the development of renewables, this article evaluates the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from hybrid energy storage systems (HESSs) in 100% renewable power systems. The consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) approach is applied to evaluate and forecast the environmental implications of HESSs. Based on the power system of Sweden, different HESS combinations, which include energy storage (ES) technologies: pumped hydro ES, hydrogen ES, lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, lead-acid (PbA) batteries, vanadium redox (VR) batteries, supercapacitors (SCs), and flywheels, are discussed. The results show that for Sweden and similar largescale utility applications, the cradle-to-gate GHG emissions from the HESS contribute to a major share of the life cycle GHG emissions due to the under-utilization of the cycle life. Among the HESSs compared in this study, the Pumped hydro+Li-ion+Flywheel combination exhibits the least life cycle GHG emissions. Moreover, the phasing out of nuclear power brings a severe challenge to the carbon reduction target. However, the introduced HESS manages to reduce GHG emissions from a 100% renewable power system.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Temporal validation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of energy systems in China
    Su, Xing
    Zhang, Xu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 : 250 - 257
  • [2] Evaluation of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydroelectricity Generation Systems
    Kadiyala, Akhil
    Kommalapati, Raghava
    Huque, Ziaul
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (06):
  • [3] Comparative life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of battery energy storage technologies for grid applications
    Han, Xiaoqu
    Li, Yanxin
    Nie, Lu
    Huang, Xiaofan
    Deng, Yelin
    Yan, Junjie
    Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios
    Karellas, Sotirios
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 392
  • [4] Comparative life cycle assessment of integrated renewable energy-based power systems
    Shamoushaki, Moein
    Koh, S. C. Lenny
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 946
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment in the Building Sector - Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Common Ceiling Systems
    Heckmann, Michael
    Glock, Christian
    BETON- UND STAHLBETONBAU, 2023, 118 (02) : 110 - 123
  • [6] Assessment of Building Greenhouse Gas Emissions Based on Hybrid Life-cycle Model
    Zeng Deheng
    Ren Hong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC & MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (EMEIT-2012), 2012, 23
  • [7] Development of net energy ratios and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of large-scale mechanical energy storage systems
    Kapila, S.
    Oni, A. O.
    Gemechu, E. D.
    Kumar, A.
    ENERGY, 2019, 170 : 592 - 603
  • [8] Review of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Photovoltaic and Concentrating Solar Power Electricity Generation Systems
    Kommalapati, Raghava
    Kadiyala, Akhil
    Shahriar, Md Tarkik
    Huque, Ziaul
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (03):
  • [9] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems
    Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan
    Gemechu, Eskinder
    Kumar, Amit
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 314
  • [10] Ecological efficiency of renewable and non-renewable energy generation power systems considering life cycle assessment
    de Paula Santos, Caio Felipe
    Bimestre, Thiago Averaldo
    Tuna, Celso Eduardo
    Silveira, Jose Luz
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 44 (11)