Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Sharma, Nabina [1 ]
Walker, Jennifer D. [2 ]
Wenghofer, Elizabeth [1 ]
Moeke-Pickering, Taima [3 ]
Lindenbach, Jeannette [4 ]
机构
[1] Laurentian Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Laurentian Univ, Sch Indigenous Relat, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[4] Laurentian Univ, Sch Nursing, Sudbury, ON, Canada
关键词
Indigenous health; Health assessment; Culturally safe; Indigenous knowledge; Scoping review; Indigenous approaches;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02496-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundHealth assessment tools developed using mainstream or Western concepts have been widely used in clinical practice worldwide. However, even culturally adapted or culturally based tools may not be relevant in other social contexts if they are grounded in Western beliefs and perspectives. The application of mainstream assessment tools, when used in Indigenous populations, can lead to the inappropriate application of normative data and inaccurate or biased diagnosis of conditions as Indigenous concepts of health differ from Western biomedical concepts of health. Thus, considering the need for culturally meaningful, sensitive, safe, and unbiased health assessment approaches and instruments over recent years, tools have been developed or adapted by and with Indigenous populations in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. However, there is no existing systematic or scoping review to identify the methods and approaches used in adapting or developing health assessment tools for use with the Indigenous population in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States.MethodsIn response to these gaps, we are working with a First Nations Community Advisory Group in Northern Ontario, Canada, to undertake a scoping review following the 2020 JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, APA PsychINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Australian Indigenous Health info data set, and Indigenous Health Portal. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion using criteria co-developed with an advisory group. We will chart the extracted information and summarize and synthesize the data. The summarized findings will be presented to a Community Advisory Group, including First Nations community partners, an Elder, and community members, and their feedback will be incorporated into the discussion section of the scoping review.DiscussionThis scoping review involves iterative consultation with the Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars, First Nations Community Advisory Group, and community partners throughout the research process. This review aims to summarize the evidence on standard ethical approaches and practices used in Indigenous research while adapting or developing health assessment tools. It will inform the larger study focused on developing an Indigenous Functional Assessment tool. Further, it will seek whether the Indigenous ways of knowing and equitable participation of Indigenous people and communities are incorporated in the Indigenous research process.Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework https://osf.io/yznwk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Health impact assessment and climate change: A scoping review
    Ammann, Priska
    Dietler, Dominik
    Winkler, Mirko S.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH, 2021, 3
  • [42] The impact of neoliberal generative mechanisms on Indigenous health: a critical realist scoping review
    Poirier, Brianna
    Sethi, Sneha
    Haag, Dandara
    Hedges, Joanne
    Jamieson, Lisa
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2022, 18 (01)
  • [43] Indigenous identity identification in administrative health care data globally: A scoping review
    Gray, Mandi
    Williams, Kienan
    Oster, Richard T.
    Bruno, Grant
    Cooper, Annelies
    Healy, Chyloe
    Rich, Rebecca
    Claringbold, Shayla Scott
    Teare, Gary
    Wessel, Samara
    Henderson, Rita I.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2024, 29 (03) : 210 - 221
  • [44] Technology-based Health Education Resources for Indigenous Adults: A Scoping Review
    Stotz, Sarah
    Hebert, Luciana E.
    Brega, Angela G.
    Lockhart, Steven
    Henderson, J. Neil
    Roubideaux, Yvette
    DeSanto, Kristen
    Moore, Kelly R.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2021, 32 (02) : 318 - 346
  • [45] Drinking water quality in Indigenous communities in Canada and health outcomes: a scoping review
    Bradford, Lori E. A.
    Bharadwaj, Lalita A.
    Okpalauwaekwe, Udoka
    Waldner, Cheryl L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2016, 75
  • [46] Indigenous mental health in a changing climate: a systematic scoping review of the global literature
    Middleton, Jacqueline
    Cunsolo, Ashlee
    Jones-Bitton, Andria
    Wright, Carlee J.
    Harper, Sherilee L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [47] The impact of neoliberal generative mechanisms on Indigenous health: a critical realist scoping review
    Brianna Poirier
    Sneha Sethi
    Dandara Haag
    Joanne Hedges
    Lisa Jamieson
    Globalization and Health, 18
  • [48] Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial access-Protocol of a scoping review
    Nielsen, Martine S.
    Ilkjaer, Frederik V.
    Grejs, Anders M.
    Nielsen, Anders B.
    Konge, Lars
    Brochner, Anne C.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 68 (09) : 1283 - 1286
  • [49] Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol
    Shahid, Anmol
    Rosgen, Brianna K.
    Krewulak, Karla D.
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Foster, Nadine
    Sept, Bonnie G.
    Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
    Stelfox, Henry T.
    Fiest, Kirsten M.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [50] Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol
    Anmol Shahid
    Brianna K. Rosgen
    Karla D. Krewulak
    Diane L. Lorenzetti
    Nadine Foster
    Bonnie G. Sept
    Jeanna Parsons Leigh
    Henry T. Stelfox
    Kirsten M. Fiest
    Systematic Reviews, 10