Developing a welfare assessment protocol for Australian lot-fed cattle

被引:2
作者
Taylor, Emily [1 ]
Dunston-Clarke, Emma [1 ]
Brookes, Daniel [2 ]
Jongman, Ellen [3 ]
Linn, Benjamin [2 ]
Barnes, Anne [1 ]
Miller, David [4 ]
Fisher, Andrew [2 ,3 ]
Collins, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Environm & Life Sci, Sch Vet Med, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Sci, Melbourne Vet Sch, Mackinnon Grp, Werribee, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Fac Sci, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Murdoch Univ, Coll Environm & Life Sci, Sch Agr Sci, Murdoch, WA, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
feedlot; animal welfare; animal behaviour; animal-based outcomes; benchmarking; QUALITATIVE BEHAVIORAL-ASSESSMENT; BOVINE RESPIRATORY-DISEASE; FARM-ANIMAL WELFARE; FEEDLOT CATTLE; RISK-FACTORS; BEEF-CATTLE; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; CARCASS TRAITS; DAIRY-CATTLE; WATER-INTAKE;
D O I
10.3389/fanim.2023.1256670
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Lot feeding of cattle has gained momentum in recent years to improve efficiency in meeting market demands for high quality protein. Concurrently, societal concern for the welfare of animals raised in intensive farming systems has increased. Thus, the reporting of animal health and welfare measures is a key goal for the Australian cattle lot-fed industry. Although feedlots vary in location, climate, capacity, cattle genotype, and feeding programs, many welfare concerns are applicable across the industry. Despite this, no recognised standardised animal welfare assessment protocol exists for the Australian lot-fed industry. This study aimed to identify relevant measures to develop an assessment protocol, by identifying key welfare issues and their relevant measures, considering the validity, reliability, and practicality of each when applied to the feedlot context. An advisory model was derived after reviewing the relevant literature and five international protocols for the assessment of beef cattle (Welfare Quality & REG;, AssureWel, US Beef Quality Assurance assessment tool, Canadian Feedlot Animal Care Assessment program, and an Australian Live Export industry protocol), followed by stakeholder consultation. A total of 109 measures were evaluated, with 99 environmental-, management-, resource- and animal-based measures being proposed. Piloting of the protocol on commercial feedlots will enable further refinement and validation, to provide an evidence-based, practical protocol to facilitate standardised monitoring of cattle welfare. Such a protocol could promote continued advances in animal welfare at a feedlot level and support a sustainable industry by addressing societal concerns.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 155 条
  • [1] Ahola J. K., 2018, WELFARE CATTLE, P173
  • [2] Anderson F., 2019, IMPACT HANDLING COND
  • [3] Animal Health Australia, 2012, AUSTR AN WELF STAND
  • [4] Animal Health Australia, 2016, AUSTR AN WELF STAND
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future
  • [6] Appleby M. C., 1997, Animal welfare., P177
  • [7] Environmental factors affecting daily water intake on cattle finished in feedlots
    Arias, R. A.
    Mader, T. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) : 245 - 251
  • [8] Effects of preshipping management on measures of stress and performance of beef steers during feedlot receiving
    Arthington, J. D.
    Qiu, X.
    Cooke, R. F.
    Vendramini, J. M. B.
    Araujo, D. B.
    Chase, C. C., Jr.
    Coleman, S. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (08) : 2016 - 2023
  • [9] Assessing synchrony in groups: Are you measuring what you think you are measuring?
    Asher, Lucy
    Collins, Lisa M.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2012, 138 (3-4) : 162 - 169
  • [10] AssureWel, 2010, BEEF CATTL