Identifying and Cultivating Innovators and Increasing Diversity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): A Needed Paradigm Shift

被引:5
作者
Maker, C. June [1 ,4 ]
Pease, Randy
Zimmerman, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] WHO, Geneva, Eswatini
[4] Univ Arizona, Dept Disabil & Psychoeduc Studies, 503 2nd St, Tucson, AZ 85705 USA
来源
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION | 2023年 / 45卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
creative problem solving; paradigm shift; STEM; talent development; talent identification; underrepresentation; GIFTED EDUCATION; SPATIAL ABILITY; INTELLIGENCE; TALENT; CREATIVITY; THINKING; IDENTIFICATION; RETHINKING; GENERALITY; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.1080/02783193.2023.2212362
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Although writers have advocated a shift from the gifted child to a talent development paradigm, changes in methods for identifying and cultivating talent in STEM are needed. We present evidence that using a talent development paradigm supported by differentiation with an organicist rather than a mechanistic perspective was effective in identifying and cultivating potential innovators in STEM while also increasing the diversity of students identified. Exceptional talent was defined as having three components integrating the constructs of intelligence and creativity: (a) solving complex problems, (b) solving varied types of problems, and (c) having a complex and integrated knowledge structure in the domains assessed. Practices consistent with the talent development and differentiation paradigms include using measures of problem solving in different domains to create profiles and providing programs to engage all students in solving real-world problems.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 177
页数:17
相关论文
共 114 条
[41]   Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects [J].
Gilhooly, K. J. ;
Fioratou, E. ;
Anthony, S. H. ;
Wynn, V. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 98 :611-625
[42]  
Gomez-Arizaga MP, 2016, EURASIA J MATH SCI T, V12, P431
[43]   Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the graduate management admissions test [J].
Hedlund, Jennifer ;
Wilt, Jeanne M. ;
Nebel, Kristina L. ;
Ashford, Susan J. ;
Sternberg, Robert J. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 16 (02) :101-127
[44]   Different research paradigms concerning giftedness and gifted education: shall ever they meet? [J].
Heller, Kurt A. .
HIGH ABILITY STUDIES, 2012, 23 (01) :73-75
[45]   Creative Thinking Ability: Domain Generality and Specificity [J].
Hong, Eunsook ;
Milgram, Roberta M. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 22 (03) :272-287
[46]  
Jenkins A.H., 2005, HUMANIST PSYCHOL, V33, P25
[47]  
Jo S., 2011, Gifted Education International, V27, P263, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941102700304, DOI 10.1177/026142941102700304]
[48]   Deferential Differentiation: What Types of Differentiation Do Students Want? [J].
Kanevsky, Lannie .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2011, 55 (04) :279-299
[49]   Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks [J].
Kaufman, JC ;
Baer, J ;
Gentile, CA .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2004, 38 (01) :56-69
[50]  
Kharkhurin AV, 2012, Multilingualism and creativity, DOI [10.21832/9781847697967, DOI 10.21832/9781847697967]