Identifying and Cultivating Innovators and Increasing Diversity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): A Needed Paradigm Shift

被引:5
作者
Maker, C. June [1 ,4 ]
Pease, Randy
Zimmerman, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] WHO, Geneva, Eswatini
[4] Univ Arizona, Dept Disabil & Psychoeduc Studies, 503 2nd St, Tucson, AZ 85705 USA
来源
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION | 2023年 / 45卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
creative problem solving; paradigm shift; STEM; talent development; talent identification; underrepresentation; GIFTED EDUCATION; SPATIAL ABILITY; INTELLIGENCE; TALENT; CREATIVITY; THINKING; IDENTIFICATION; RETHINKING; GENERALITY; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.1080/02783193.2023.2212362
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Although writers have advocated a shift from the gifted child to a talent development paradigm, changes in methods for identifying and cultivating talent in STEM are needed. We present evidence that using a talent development paradigm supported by differentiation with an organicist rather than a mechanistic perspective was effective in identifying and cultivating potential innovators in STEM while also increasing the diversity of students identified. Exceptional talent was defined as having three components integrating the constructs of intelligence and creativity: (a) solving complex problems, (b) solving varied types of problems, and (c) having a complex and integrated knowledge structure in the domains assessed. Practices consistent with the talent development and differentiation paradigms include using measures of problem solving in different domains to create profiles and providing programs to engage all students in solving real-world problems.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 177
页数:17
相关论文
共 114 条
[21]  
Berman S., 2010, CAPITALIZING COMPLEX
[22]   SCIENCE TALENT - THE PLAY OF EXEMPLAR AND PARADIGM IN THE SCIENCE-EDUCATION OF SCIENCE-PRONE YOUNG [J].
BRANDWEIN, PF .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1992, 76 (02) :121-139
[23]  
Bransford J.A., 2000, How people learn, DOI [10.17226/9853, DOI 10.17226/9853]
[24]   Psychometrics, intelligence, and public perception [J].
Carroll, JB .
INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 24 (01) :25-52
[25]   Latent class cluster analysis in exploring different profiles of gifted and talented students [J].
Castejon, J. L. ;
Gilar, R. ;
Minano, P. ;
Gonzalez, M. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 50 :166-174
[26]   Examining Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of Differentiated Practices, Student Engagement, and Teacher Qualities [J].
Chandra Handa, Manoj .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ACADEMICS, 2020, 31 (04) :530-568
[27]   CATEGORIZATION AND REPRESENTATION OF PHYSICS PROBLEMS BY EXPERTS AND NOVICES [J].
CHI, MTH ;
FELTOVICH, PJ ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1981, 5 (02) :121-152
[28]   Academic developmental patterns of the Korean gifted during the 18 years after identification [J].
Cho, Seokhee ;
Ahn, Doehee ;
Han, Suksil ;
Park, Hyejin .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 45 (08) :784-789
[29]   Three Paradigms of Gifted Education: In Search of Conceptual Clarity in Research and Practice [J].
Dai, David Yun ;
Chen, Fei .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2013, 57 (03) :151-168
[30]  
de Vries MJ, 2011, BOST STUD PHILOS SCI, V274, P47, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_4