Transfer Learning in Deep Learning Models for Building Load Forecasting: Case of Limited Data

被引:4
作者
Nawar, Menna [1 ]
Shomer, Moustafa [1 ]
Faddel, Samy [2 ]
Gong, Huangjie [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Higher Inst Engn & Technol, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] ABB Inc, US Res Ctr, Houston, TX USA
来源
SOUTHEASTCON 2023 | 2023年
关键词
Deep Learning; Transfer Learning; Load Forecasting; Transformer; Sequential Models; SHORT-TERM;
D O I
10.1109/SoutheastCon51012.2023.10115128
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Precise load forecasting in buildings could increase the bill savings potential and facilitate optimized strategies for power generation planning. With the rapid evolution of computer science, data- driven techniques, in particular the Deep Learning models, have become a promising solution for the load forecasting problem. These models have showed accurate forecasting results; however, they need abundance amount of historical data to maintain the performance. Considering the new buildings and buildings with low resolution measuring equipment, it is difficult to get enough historical data from them, leading to poor forecasting performance. In order to adapt Deep Learning models for buildings with limited and scarce data, this paper proposes a Building-to-Building Transfer Learning framework to overcome the problem and enhance the performance of Deep Learning models. The transfer learning approach was applied to a new technique known as Transformer model due to its efficacy in capturing data trends. The performance of the algorithm was tested on a large commercial building with limited data. The result showed that the proposed approach improved the forecasting accuracy by 56.8% compared to the case of conventional deep learning where training from scratch is used. The paper also compared the proposed Transformer model to other sequential deep learning models such as Long-short Term Memory (LSTM) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). The accuracy of the transformer model outperformed other models by reducing the root mean square error to 0.009, compared to LSTM with 0.011 and RNN with 0.051.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Agrawal RK, 2018, 2018 IEEE TEXAS POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (TPEC)
[2]  
Al-Hamadi HM, 2005, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V74, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2004.10.015
[3]   Big Data Analytics for Short and Medium-Term Electricity Load Forecasting Using an AI Techniques Ensembler [J].
Ayub, Nasir ;
Irfan, Muhammad ;
Awais, Muhammad ;
Ali, Usman ;
Ali, Tariq ;
Hamdi, Mohammed ;
Alghamdi, Abdullah ;
Muhammad, Fazal .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (19)
[4]  
Bahdanau D, 2016, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1409.0473, 10.48550/arXiv.1409.0473, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1409.0473]
[5]  
Eia.gov, 2022, US
[6]   Deep learning-based feature engineering methods for improved building energy prediction [J].
Fan, Cheng ;
Sun, Yongjun ;
Zhao, Yang ;
Song, Mengjie ;
Wang, Jiayuan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 240 :35-45
[7]  
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)-U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2022, US
[8]   Using Support Vector Machine to Predict Next Day Electricity Load of Public Buildings with Sub-metering Devices [J].
Fu, Yangyang ;
Li, Zhengwei ;
Zhang, Hao ;
Xu, Peng .
9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (ISHVAC) JOINT WITH THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (COBEE), 2015, 121 :1016-1022
[9]   Medium term system load forecasting with a dynamic artificial neural network model [J].
Ghiassi, M ;
Zimbra, DK ;
Saidane, H .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2006, 76 (05) :302-316
[10]  
González-Vidal A, 2017, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P4562, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2017.8258499