Investigating the Effects of Design-Based STEM Learning on Primary Students' STEM Creativity and Epistemic Beliefs

被引:10
作者
Wan, Zhi Hong [1 ,2 ]
So, Wing Mui Winnie [3 ]
Zhan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Tai Po, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Modern Teaching Technol, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Sci & Environm Studies, Tai Po, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Creativity; Design; Epistemic beliefs; Information technology; STEM; ELEMENTARY SCIENCE; CRITICAL THINKING; ROBOTICS; ABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; CONTEXT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10763-023-10370-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Integrated STEM education has been the focus of recent curriculum reforms worldwide. Learning through design is a distinctive and significant approach to achieving STEM integration. Although studies have investigated various outcomes of design-based STEM learning, little has been done to examine its influence on two significant learning outcomes-STEM creativity and epistemic beliefs, especially in the context of primary education. In this study, we investigated the effects of a 6-month design-based STEM learning event (in which the application of information technologies was required) on 155 upper primary students' STEM creativity and epistemic beliefs. The results showed (i) a significant improvement in the fluency and flexibility dimensions of STEM creativity, (ii) a significant decrease in the source, certainty, and justification dimensions of epistemic beliefs, and (iii) no statistically significant change in the originality dimension of STEM creativity or the complexity dimension of epistemic beliefs. Moreover, we found significant and negative correlations between STEM creativity and the source, certainty, and justification dimensions of epistemic beliefs, but a significant and positive correlation between STEM creativity and the complexity dimension of epistemic beliefs. The findings of this study generate additional evidence to support design-based learning as a meaningful and feasible approach to achieving STEM integration in primary schools. Suggestions are made on how to design and implement integrated STEM education in primary schools.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 108
页数:22
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2015 - 2016
[2]  
Australian Department of Education, 2022, AUSTR CURR
[3]   The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity [J].
Baer, John .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (03) :165-178
[4]  
Beghetto RA, 2019, CREATIV THEOR ACT ED, V3, P27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_2
[5]   Exploring student beliefs and understanding in elementary science and mathematics [J].
Beghetto, Ronald A. ;
Baxter, Juliet A. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2012, 49 (07) :942-960
[6]   What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships [J].
Breiner, Jonathan M. ;
Harkness, Shelly Sheats ;
Johnson, Carla C. ;
Koehler, Catherine M. .
SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2012, 112 (01) :3-11
[7]  
Bybee R.W., 2013, The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities, DOI DOI 10.2505/9781936959259
[8]   Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: a systematic literature review [J].
Cetin, Mustafa ;
Demircan, Hasibe Ozlen .
EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2020, 190 (09) :1323-1335
[9]   General, artistic and scientific creativity attributes of engineering and music students [J].
Charyton, Christine ;
Snelbecker, Glenn E. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2007, 19 (2-3) :213-225
[10]   Exploring the effects of classroom learning environment on critical thinking skills and disposition: A study of Hong Kong 12th graders in Liberal Studies [J].
Cheng, May Hung May ;
Wan, Zhi Hong .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2017, 24 :152-163