The General Flow Proneness Scale: Aspects of Reliability and Validity of a New 13-Item Scale Assessing Flow

被引:4
作者
Elnes, Magdalena [1 ]
Sigmundsson, Hermundur [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] OsloMet Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
assessment; flow; learning; achievement; reliability; validity; EXPERIENCE; PERSONALITY; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1177/21582440231153850
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this article, we report the development and validation of a new measure for flow proneness. The General Flow Proneness Scale is a quantitative measure which is simple to administer, and is context independent. Test-retest reliability was tested on 23 adults, 1 week apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) between the test and retest scores was .956. The General Flow Proneness Scale was further tested on 228 participants between 18 and 76 years of age (mean age = 34.66, SD = 14.75), which allowed for the exploration of applicability, internal consistency, and construct validity. The overall results indicate that the scale is applicable for the age studied (18-76). All individual item scores showed a positive correlation with the total score, and ranged between .20 and .67. The Cronbach's alpha value was .78 for the standardized items. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the total score of the General Flow Proneness Scale and the total score of the Swedish Flow Proneness Questionnaire including all domains was r = .573 (p < .001); for the student group r = .645 (p < .001); for the professionally active group r = .475 (p < .001). These promising results warrant further development of the General Flow Proneness scale, including normalization based on a larger, representative sample.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Andersen J., 2004, HC ANDERSEN BIOGRAFI
[2]  
Asakawa K., 2004, Journal of Happiness Studies, V5, P123, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89, DOI 10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89, 10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89, 10.1023/b:johs.0000035915.97836.89]
[4]   Flow and performance: A study among talented Dutch soccer players [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Oerlemans, Wido ;
Demerouti, Evangelia ;
Slot, Bart Bruins ;
Ali, Donovan Karamat .
PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2011, 12 (04) :442-450
[5]  
Baumann N, 2012, ADVANCES IN FLOW RESEARCH, P165, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_9
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   When quantity is not enough: Disentangling the roles of practice time, self-regulation and deliberate practice in musical achievement [J].
Bonneville-Roussy, Arielle ;
Bouffard, Therese .
PSYCHOLOGY OF MUSIC, 2015, 43 (05) :686-704
[8]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[9]  
Csikszentmihalyi M., 1993, Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure
[10]  
Csikszentmihalyi M., 1975, BOREDOM ANXIETY