Toward Evidence-Based Urban Planning Integrating Quality Assessments in Literature Reviews

被引:6
|
作者
Ravensbergen, Lea [1 ]
El-Geneidy, Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Transport Studies Unit, Oxford, England
[2] McGill Univ, Sch Urban Planning, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
evaluation of certainty of evidence; literature review; practice-oriented; quality assessment; risk of bias assessment; PUBLIC-HEALTH; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1080/01944363.2022.2074872
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Literature reviews can play a pivotal role in designing urban policies. Here we introduce two tools used by public health specialists to assess the quality of studies and quantify the evidence derived from them: the Risk of Bias Assessment (RoB) and Evaluation of Certainty of Evidence (ECE). The RoB scores articles on several domains (e.g., selection bias, study design, etc.) to provide an appraisal of how rigorous the study is, whereas the ECE tool provides a framework to clearly state how much certainty there is in the outcomes under study. Both tools can be used to enhance literature review articles in urban planning to better inform practitioners on how to best develop policies using a rigorous approach.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence-Based Reviews: Trends in Nephrology Nursing
    Harwood, Lori
    Wilson, Barbara
    Pye, Darrin
    Stroud, Nicole
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2019, 46 (02) : 249 - 259
  • [2] Evidence-based health services planning
    Mathis, S.
    Piso, B.
    Wild, C.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2010, 53 (07) : 733 - 739
  • [3] Cochrane reviews and the behavioural turn in evidence-based medicine
    Bell, Kirsten
    HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 21 (03): : 313 - 321
  • [4] Toward a Transdisciplinary Model of Evidence-Based Practice
    Satterfield, Jason M.
    Spring, Bonnie
    Brownson, Ross C.
    Mullen, Edward J. .
    Newhouse, Robin P.
    Walker, Barbara B.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2009, 87 (02) : 368 - 390
  • [5] Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Education: What International Literature Reviews Tell Us and What They Don't
    Hornby, Garry
    Gable, Robert A.
    Evans, William
    PREVENTING SCHOOL FAILURE, 2013, 57 (03): : 119 - 123
  • [6] Systematic reviews versus narrative reviews in clinical anatomy: Methodological approaches in the era of evidence-based anatomy
    Henry, Brandon Michael
    Skinningsrud, Bendik
    Vikse, Jens
    Pekala, Przemyslaw A.
    Walocha, Jerzy A.
    Loukas, Marious
    Tubbs, R. Shane
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2018, 31 (03) : 364 - 367
  • [7] Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews
    Gialdini, Celina
    Chamillard, Monica
    Diaz, Virginia
    Pasquale, Julia
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Abalos, Edgardo
    Torloni, Maria Regina
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 72
  • [8] Evidence-based public health practice: improving the quality and quantity of the evidence
    Waters, E
    Doyle, J
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2002, 24 (03): : 227 - 229
  • [9] An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality
    Cooper, Simon
    Cant, Robyn
    Kelly, Michelle
    Levett-Jones, Tracy
    McKenna, Lisa
    Seaton, Philippa
    Bogossian, Fiona
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 230 - 240
  • [10] A systematic review of the literature to support an evidence-based Precepting Program
    Mann-Salinas, Elizabeth
    Hayes, Elizabeth
    Robbins, Johnnie
    Sabido, Jean
    Feider, Laura
    Allen, David
    Yoder, Linda
    BURNS, 2014, 40 (03) : 374 - 387