Can social capital facilitate households' donations in rural China?

被引:2
作者
Chen, Siwei [1 ]
Liu, Chengfang [1 ]
Huang, Jikun [1 ]
Zhi, Huayong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Donation; Social capital; Common prosperity; The third distribution; PUBLIC-GOODS; PHILANTHROPY; RESOURCES; VOLUNTARY; INCOME; RECIPROCITY; PREDICTORS; INEQUALITY; CHARITY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Charitable donations by individuals are an important component of the third distribution. This paper examines the causal effect of social capital on donations by households in rural China. To do so, we draw on two waves of nationally representative household survey data collected by the authors themselves on 3295 households from eight provinces in China in 2018 and 2022. Our data show that about 24% of sample households ever donated money in 2019-2021, with the primary purpose of helping poor and sick individuals. We further use an instrumental variable approach to address the potential endogeneity of social networks. Results from two-stage least squares suggest that rural households with more social capital (as indicated by stronger social networks and with CPC family members) not only tend to be more likely to donate, but also donate more frequently and more amount during the study period. Results from mechanism analyses suggest that social capital promotes rural households' donations through the information effect, responsibility effect and reputation effect. The above results are robust to different model specifications and weighting schemes. This paper adds empirical evidence to inform policymaking in promoting charitable donations in China's pursuit of common prosperity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica [J].
Alpizar, Francisco ;
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (5-6) :1047-1060
[2]   Social capital and contributions in a public-goods experiment [J].
Anderson, LR ;
Mellor, JM ;
Milyo, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (02) :373-376
[3]   GIVING WITH IMPURE ALTRUISM - APPLICATIONS TO CHARITY AND RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE [J].
ANDREONI, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (06) :1447-1458
[4]   Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially [J].
Ariely, Dan ;
Bracha, Anat ;
Meier, Stephan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (01) :544-555
[5]   Charitable giving, income, and taxes: An analysis of panel data [J].
Auten, GE ;
Sieg, H ;
Clotfelter, CT .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (01) :371-382
[6]   Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting [J].
Bateson, Melissa ;
Nettle, Daniel ;
Roberts, Gilbert .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 2 (03) :412-414
[7]   THEORY OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1974, 82 (06) :1063-1093
[8]   Traditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality [J].
Bekkers, Rene .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2006, 69 (04) :349-366
[9]   Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving Part One: Religion, education, age and socialisation [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW, 2011, 2 (03) :337-365
[10]   A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2011, 40 (05) :924-973