Comparative analysis of toxicity in patients with anal cancer undergoing definitive simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) or sequential integrated boost (SeqB) radiotherapy

被引:0
作者
Rotondi, Margherita [1 ]
Facondo, Giuseppe [1 ]
Mossa, Stefano [1 ]
Vullo, Gianluca [1 ]
Angelicone, Ilaria [1 ]
Valeriani, Maurizio [1 ]
Osti, Mattia Falchetto [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Med & Surg & Translat Med, Radiotherapy Oncol, I-00189 Rome, Italy
关键词
Radiotherapy; Anal cancer; Toxicities; SIB; Sequential boost; Fecal incontinence; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; FECAL INCONTINENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; GUIDELINES; MITOMYCIN; SURVIVAL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04411-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo compare toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients (pts) with anal cancer treated with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) versus sequential boost (SeqB).MethodsSixty-six patients were treated from 2007 to 2021. Thirty patients underwent to SeqB concurrent to CHT and 37 to SIB-group. Toxicity assessment has been considered in acute and in late toxicities for gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), cutaneous (CU) districts, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0. The Wexner scale among summary scoring systems has been used as a tool to measure fecal incontinence. The chi-square test for ordinal variables were used to evaluate the association between patient and treatment characteristics and acute or late severe toxicity. Univariable logistic regression models were fit to evaluate predictive factors associated with fecal incontinence.ResultsMedian follow-up was 61.5 months (IQR, 27.1-121.7 months) for all patients. Severe acute toxicity (>= G2) was observed in 49 patients (74.2%). Late toxicity (>= G2) occurred in 13 cases (19.6%). In assessment of cutaneous toxicity, there was also a significant reduction in >= G1 in SIB group with 29 patients (80.5%) vs SeqB group with 29 patients (96.6%) (p-value = 0.046). Of both groups 11 patients (16.6%) developed fecal incontinence, 8 (22%) in the SIB group and 3 (10%) in the SeqB.ConclusionSIB for anal cancer treatment results in reduced acute and late cutaneous toxicity compared to SeqB. According to our results the rate of other acute and late toxicities are low and comparable between the two groups.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Ajani JA, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p180S
  • [2] Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: Results of a phase III randomized trial of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer radiotherapy and gastrointestinal cooperative groups
    Bartelink, H
    Roelofsen, F
    Eschwege, F
    Rougier, P
    Bosset, JF
    Gonzalez, DG
    Peiffert, D
    vanGlabbeke, M
    Pierart, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) : 2040 - 2049
  • [3] Faecal incontinence after chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer survivors: Long-term results of a national cohort
    Bentzen, Anne Gry
    Guren, Marianne G.
    Vonen, Barthold
    Wanderas, Eva H.
    Frykholm, Gunilla
    Wilsgaard, Tom
    Dahl, Olav
    Balteskard, Lise
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [4] Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review
    Bin Pan, Yi
    Maeda, Yasuko
    Wilson, Ana
    Glynne-Jones, Rob
    Vaizey, Carolynne J.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (11) : 1427 - 1437
  • [5] Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer Results From a Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
    Call, Jason A.
    Prendergast, Brendan M.
    Jensen, Lindsay G.
    Ord, Celine B.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Jacob, Rojymon
    Mell, Loren K.
    Thomas, Charles R.
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    Miller, Robert C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 39 (01): : 8 - 12
  • [6] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of squamous cell anal canal cancer: acute and early-late toxicity, outcome, and efficacy
    Dell'Acqua, Veronica
    Surgo, Alessia
    Arculeo, Simona
    Zerella, Maria Alessia
    Bagnardi, Vincenzo
    Frassoni, Samuele
    Zampino, Maria Giulia
    Ravenda, Paola Simona
    Rotundo, Maria Saveria
    Kraja, Fatjona
    Kobiela, Jarek
    Spychalski, Piotr
    Fodor, Cristiana
    Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra
    Cattani, Federica
    Bazani, Alessia
    Petz, Wanda
    Glynne-Jones, Robert
    Orecchia, Roberto
    Leonardi, Maria Cristina
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (04) : 685 - 694
  • [7] Diaconescu M, 2018, Curr Health Sci J, V44, P5, DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.44.01.01
  • [8] Comparing simultaneous integrated boost vs sequential boost in anal cancer patients: results of a retrospective observational study
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    De Bari, Berardino
    Arcadipane, Francesca
    Lepinoy, Alexis
    Ceccarelli, Manuela
    Furfaro, Gabriella
    Mistrangelo, Massimiliano
    Cassoni, Paola
    Valgiusti, Martina
    Passardi, Alessandro
    Gardini, Andrea Casadei
    Trino, Elisabetta
    Martini, Stefania
    Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo
    Evangelista, Andrea
    Ricardi, Umberto
    Crehange, Gilles
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 : 172
  • [9] Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies
    Freites-Martinez, A.
    Santana, N.
    Arias-Santiago, S.
    Viera, A.
    [J]. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2021, 112 (01): : 90 - 92
  • [10] Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
    Glynne-Jones, Robert
    Nilsson, Per J.
    Aschele, Carlo
    Goh, Vicky
    Peiffert, Didier
    Cervantes, Andres
    Arnold, Dirk
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (03) : 330 - 339