Assurance level choice, CPA fees, and financial reporting benefits: Inferences from US private firms

被引:8
作者
Badertscher, Brad A. [1 ]
Kim, Jaewoo [2 ]
Kinney Jr, William R. [3 ]
Owens, Edward [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX USA
[4] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] David Eccles Sch Business, 1655 Campus Ctr Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
Assurance levels; Audits; Reviews; CPA fees; Financial reporting quality; Cost of debt; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; AUDITOR ASSURANCE; QUALITY; ACCRUALS; DEMAND; EQUITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101551
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Many U.S. private firms choose either a financial statement compilation or review rather than the higher assurance provided by an audit, yet little is known about these choices. We explore economic aspects of private firm choice of less-than-audit levels of assurance applied to GAAP-based financial statements. We find that CPA fees more than double for each increment in assurance. Commonly used financial reporting quality proxies are higher for both reviews and audits relative to compilations but are statistically indistin-guishable on average between reviews and audits. Cost of debt is significantly lower for reviews than for compilations and significantly lower for audits than for reviews. Finally, we find that assurance level choices are associated with bank debt, trade credit, and po-tential internal information reliability and control concerns. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
AICPA, 2017, GUID FIN STAT SERV C
[2]   The Demand for Financial Statements in an Unregulated Environment: An Examination of the Production and Use of Financial Statements by Privately Held Small Businesses [J].
Allee, Kristian D. ;
Yohn, Teti Lombardi .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2009, 84 (01) :1-25
[3]   Financial statement errors: evidence from the distributional properties of financial statement numbers [J].
Amiram, Dan ;
Bozanic, Zahn ;
Rouen, Ethan .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2015, 20 (04) :1540-1593
[4]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Journal of forensic accounting, DOI 10.2308/jfac.2004.5.2.17
[6]   Capital Market Consequences of Audit Partner Quality [J].
Aobdia, Daniel ;
Lin, Chan-Jane ;
Petacchi, Reining .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (06) :2143-2176
[7]   Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Jagolinzer, Alan D. ;
Larcker, David F. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (02) :225-271
[8]   Public Equity and Audit Pricing in the United States [J].
Badertscher, Brad ;
Jorgensen, Bjorn ;
Katz, Sharon ;
Kinney, William .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (02) :303-339
[9]   Externalities of public firm presence: Evidence from private firms' investment decisions [J].
Badertscher, Brad ;
Shroff, Nemit ;
White, Hal D. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (03) :682-706
[10]   Accounting Informs Investors and Earnings Management is Rife: Two Questionable Beliefs [J].
Ball, Ray .
ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2013, 27 (04) :847-853