Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial

被引:1
作者
Nguyen, Paul V. [1 ,2 ]
Donneaux, Bertrand [2 ]
Louis, Celine [2 ]
Bodgal, Zsuzsa [2 ]
Philippi, Sven [2 ]
Biver, Sylvie [2 ]
Frederick, Berangere [2 ]
Harze, Ludovic [2 ]
Lasar, Yves [3 ]
Vogin, Guillaume [2 ]
Nickers, Philippe [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHU UCL Namur Site St Elisabeth, Dept Radiotherapy, Namur, Belgium
[2] Ctr Francois Baclesse, Dept Radiotherapy, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[3] Emile Mayrisch Hosp, Dept Radiol, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[4] CHU Liege, Dept Radiotherapy, Ave Hop 1, Liege, Belgium
关键词
prostate cancer; stereotactic radiation; SBRT; focal therapies for prostate cancer; morbidity; Phase II trial; focal radiotherapy; focal SBRT; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; THERAPY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IntroductionSince radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. MethodsPatients were recruited in 2016-2019 if they had: localized CAPRA <= 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS >= 4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with >= 1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade >= 3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). ConclusionFocal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Focal therapy for prostate cancer: Making the punishment fit the crime [J].
Aoun, F. ;
Mjaess, G. ;
Tayeh, G. Abi ;
Sarkis, J. ;
Lilly, E. ;
Khalil, N. ;
Chebel, R. ;
Albisinni, S. ;
Roumeguere, T. ;
Peltier, A. .
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2021, 31 (16) :1080-1089
[2]   Padeliporfi n vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy versus active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer (CLIN1001 PCM301): an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial [J].
Azzouzi, Abdel-Rahmene ;
Vincendeau, Sebastien ;
Barret, Eric ;
Cicco, Antony ;
Kleinclauss, Francois ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
Stief, Christian G. ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Solsona, Eduardo ;
Alcaraz, Antonio ;
Tammela, Teuvo T. ;
Rosario, Derek J. ;
Gomez-Veiga, Francisco ;
Ahlgren, Goran ;
Benzaghou, Fawzi ;
Gaillac, Bertrand ;
Amzal, Billy ;
Debruyne, Frans M. J. ;
Fromont, Gaelle ;
Gratzke, Christian ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) :181-191
[3]   Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Developments to Date [J].
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Valdagni, Riccardo ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
van Poppel, Hein ;
Klotz, Laurence ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) :646-648
[4]   Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Ruutu, Mirja ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Stark, Jennifer R. ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Bratell, Stefan ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (18) :1708-1717
[5]   Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial [J].
Brand, Douglas H. ;
Tree, Alison C. ;
Ostler, Peter ;
van der Voet, Hans ;
Loblaw, Andrew ;
Chu, William ;
Ford, Daniel ;
Tolan, Shaun ;
Jain, Suneil ;
Martin, Alexander ;
Staffurth, John ;
Camilleri, Philip ;
Kancherla, Kiran ;
Frew, John ;
Chan, Andrew ;
Dayes, Ian S. ;
Henderson, Daniel ;
Brown, Stephanie ;
Cruickshank, Clare ;
Burnett, Stephanie ;
Duffton, Aileen ;
Griffin, Clare ;
Hinder, Victoria ;
Morrison, Kirsty ;
Naismith, Olivia ;
Hall, Emma ;
van As, Nicholas .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (11) :1531-1543
[6]   The University of California, San Francisco cancer of the prostate risk assessment score: A straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Elkin, EP ;
Litwin, MS ;
Latini, DM ;
DuChane, J ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (06) :1938-1942
[7]   10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Hamdy, F. C. ;
Donovan, J. L. ;
Lane, J. A. ;
Mason, M. ;
Metcalfe, C. ;
Holding, P. ;
Davis, M. ;
Peters, T. J. ;
Turner, E. L. ;
Martin, R. M. ;
Oxley, J. ;
Robinson, M. ;
Staffurth, J. ;
Walsh, E. ;
Bollina, P. ;
Catto, J. ;
Doble, A. ;
Doherty, A. ;
Gillatt, D. ;
Kockelbergh, R. ;
Kynaston, H. ;
Paul, A. ;
Powell, P. ;
Prescott, S. ;
Rosario, D. J. ;
Rowe, E. ;
Neal, D. E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) :1415-1424
[8]   Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Hoffman, Karen E. ;
Penson, David F. ;
Zhao, Zhiguo ;
Huang, Li-Ching ;
Conwill, Ralph ;
Laviana, Aaron A. ;
Joyce, Daniel D. ;
Luckenbaugh, Amy N. ;
Goodman, Michael ;
Hamilton, Ann S. ;
Wu, Xiao-Cheng ;
Paddock, Lisa E. ;
Stroup, Antoinette ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Hashibe, Mia ;
O'Neil, Brock B. ;
Kaplan, Sherrie H. ;
Greenfield, Sheldon ;
Koyama, Tatsuki ;
Barocas, Daniel A. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (02) :149-163
[9]   An Updated Systematic Review on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: What Has Changed over the Past 5 Years? [J].
Hopstaken, Jana S. ;
Bomers, Joyce G. R. ;
Sedelaar, Michiel J. P. ;
Valerio, Massimo ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 (01) :5-33
[10]   Outcome of surgery for clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer: A single-institution experience [J].
Hsu, Chao-Yu ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Oyen, Raymond ;
Roskams, Tania ;
Van Poppel, Hein .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (01) :121-129