General well-being of intensive care nurses: A prototype analysis

被引:3
作者
Jarden, Rebecca J. [1 ]
Sandham, Margaret [2 ]
Siegert, Richard J. [2 ,3 ]
Koziol-McLain, Jane [2 ]
机构
[1] Melbourne Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, 161 Barry St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Auckland Univ Technol AUT, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Auckland Univ Technol AUT, Sch Publ Hlth & Psychosocial Studies, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
ICU; intensive care nurse; prototype analysis; well-being; COMPASSION FATIGUE; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; GRADUATE NURSES; HEALTH OUTCOMES; STRESS; BURNOUT; DISEASE; ANXIETY; MAORI;
D O I
10.1111/nicc.12706
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Prototype analyses of well-being have identified central characteristics and prototypicality for New Zealand teachers, lawyers, adolescents, and work well-being of nurses. What has not yet been explored is the broad construct of well-being in intensive care nurses. Aims and objectives To identify intensive care nurses' conceptions of general well-being and investigate whether their general well-being is prototypically organized. Design Prototype analysis. Methods Three linked studies conceptualize well-being in this prototype analysis. In study 1, nurses reported features of well-being. Study 2 investigated the organization of these features. Study 3 sought confirmation of prototypical organization. Results Sixty-five New Zealand nurses participated. For study 1 (n = 23), the most frequently reported elements of well-being included physical health (n = 26), work-life balance (n = 20), and personal relationships (n = 18). For study 2 (n = 25), the highest rated elements included mental and emotional health, [general] health, work-life balance, and love. Work-life balance, physical health, and personal relationships were in the top five most frequently reported and were rated in the top 12 most central. Overall, ratings of centrality and the number of times reported were positively correlated (r = 0.33, P < .005). For study 3 (n = 17), confirmatory analyses did not reach statistical significance (P = .15). Conclusions Physical health, work-life balance, and personal relationships are key characteristics of well-being for intensive care nurses. Mental, emotional, and general health and work-life balance were considered most important for well-being. Relevance to clinical practice Physical health, work-life balance, and personal relationships are key characteristics of well-being for intensive care nurses. These characteristics of the broad construct of well-being are helpful in both defining and identifying conceptual models of well-being that may be used to inform the development and measurement of well-being programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 100
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [51] New Zealand Treasury, 2019, WELLB BUDG
  • [52] Nursing Council of New Zealand, 2020, NURS COH REP LONG ST
  • [53] Nursing Council of New Zealand, 2015, NZ NURS WORKF PROF N
  • [54] Oades L., 2017, WELLBEING LANGUAGE D
  • [55] Wellbeing literacy: A language-use capability relevant to wellbeing outcomes of positive psychology interventions
    Oades, Lindsay G.
    Ozturk, Corina
    Hou, Hanchao
    Slemp, Gavin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 15 (05) : 696 - 700
  • [56] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013, MEAS WELL BEING PROG
  • [57] Palmer S, 2004, NEW ZEAL J PSYCHOL, V33, P50
  • [58] Does positive affect influence health?
    Pressman, SD
    Cohen, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2005, 131 (06) : 925 - 971
  • [59] How can we build and maintain the resilience of our health care professionals during COVID-19? Recommendations based on a scoping review
    Rieckert, Anja
    Schuit, Ewoud
    Bleijenberg, Nienke
    ten Cate, Debbie
    de Lange, Wendela
    de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M.
    Mathijssen, Elke
    Smit, Linda C.
    Stalpers, Dewi
    Schoonhoven, Lisette
    Veldhuizen, Jessica D.
    Trappenburg, Jaap C. A.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [60] COGNITIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORIES
    ROSCH, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1975, 104 (03) : 192 - 233