Enhancing self-management skills of students through primary school class activities based on the Selection, Design, Organization, and Assessment model: a mixed methods study

被引:0
作者
Yu, Siliang [1 ,3 ]
Yao, Cheng [1 ]
Xue, Qiaoqiao [2 ]
Jantharajit, Nirat [1 ]
Kanjanakate, Supawadee [1 ]
机构
[1] Nakhon Phanom Univ, Fac Educ, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand
[2] Sichuan Normal Univ, Fac Educ & Sci, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Nakhon Phanom Univ, 103 Kham Thao, Kham Thao 48000, Thailand
关键词
Mixed methods research; student self-management; primary school; class activities; Selection; Design; Organisation; and Assessment (SDOA) model; TEACHER-EDUCATION; ENGAGEMENT; PERCEPTIONS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1080/02188791.2024.2328238
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Class activities are a pivotal instrument in augmenting students' self-management skills. However, a prevalent challenge is the passive participation of students, leading to a diminished sense of engagement. To tackle this issue, this study undertook an in-depth analysis to identify the underlying issues hampering the effectiveness of class activities. Consequently, the Selection, Design, Organization, and Assessment (SDOA) class activity model was developed, aimed specifically at enhancing students' self-management skills. The study encompassed a sample of 100 elementary school students from two distinct classes, engaging them in a series of meticulously designed activities under the SDOA model, and subsequently interviewing them. The empirical results indicate that class activities structured around the SDOA model significantly improve the self-management capabilities of students. Hence, incorporating the SDOA model into class activities in elementary schools emerges as a robust strategy in fostering self-management competencies among students.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]   A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognising the learning needs of students [J].
Jenkins, James O. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (05) :565-576
[22]   An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning [J].
Johnson, David W. ;
Johnson, Roger T. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (05) :365-379
[23]   Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching [J].
Kirschner, Paul A. ;
Sweller, John ;
Clark, Richard E. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (02) :75-86
[24]   Higher education students' attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond 'educational bulimia? [J].
Lea, SJ ;
Stephenson, D ;
Troy, J .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2003, 28 (03) :321-334
[25]   A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it [J].
Lee, Eunbae ;
Hannafin, Michael J. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 64 (04) :707-734
[26]   Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more [J].
Lee, Icy .
LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2019, 52 (04) :524-536
[27]  
Levi-Feldman I., 2020, Opinion, V16, P43, DOI [10.1108/IJMCE-10-2017-0067, DOI 10.1108/IJMCE-10-2017-0067]
[28]  
Lubis L, 2022, Nidhomul Haq Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, V7, P201, DOI [10.31538/ndh.v7i2.2031, https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v7i2.2031, DOI 10.31538/NDH.V7I2.2031]
[29]   Emerging positive organizational behavior [J].
Luthans, Fred ;
Youssef, Carolyn A. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2007, 33 (03) :321-349
[30]   Agency, responsibility and equity in teacher versus student-centred school activities: A comparison between teachers' and learners' perceptions [J].
Mameli, Consuelo ;
Grazia, Valentina ;
Molinari, Luisa .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL CHANGE, 2020, 21 (02) :345-361