Advancing knowledge-based intensity modulated proton planning for adaptive treatment of high-risk prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Johnson, Casey L. [1 ]
Hasan, Shaakir [1 ]
Huang, Sheng [1 ]
Lin, Haibo [1 ,2 ]
Gorovets, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Shim, Andy [1 ]
Apgar, Thomas [1 ]
Yu, Francis [1 ]
Tsai, Pingfang [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Proton Ctr, 225 East 126th St, New York, NY 10035 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Proton; Adaptive planning; High-risk prostate cancer; Intensity-modulated proton therapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; BLADDER; VOLUME; PLANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To assess the performance of a knowledge -based planning (KBP) model for generating intensitymodulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans as part of an adaptive radiotherapy (ART) strategy for patients with high -risk prostate cancer. A knowledge -based planning (KBP) model for proton adaptive treatment plan generation was developed based on thirty patient treatment plans utilizing RapidPlanTM PT (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The model was subsequently validated using an additional eleven patient cases. All patients in the study were administered a prescribed dose of 70.2 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicle (CTV70.2), along with 46.8 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes (CTV46.8) through simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. To assess the quality of the validation knowledge -based proton plans (KBPPs), target coverage and organ -at -risk (OAR) dose -volume constraints were compared against those of clinically used expert plans using paired t -tests. The KBP model training statistics ( R2 ) (mean +/- SD, 0.763 +/- 0.167, range, 0.406 to 0.907) and chi 2 values (1.162 +/- 0.0867, 1.039-1.253) indicate acceptable model training quality. Moreover, the average total treatment planning optimization and calculation time for adaptive plan generation is approximately 10 minutes. The CTV70.2 D98% for the KBPPs (mean +/- SD, 69.1 +/- 0.08 Gy) and expert plans (69.9 +/- 0.04 Gy) shows a significant difference ( p < 0.05) but are both within 1.1 Gy of the prescribed dose which is clinically acceptable. While the maximum dose for some organs -at -risk (OARs) such as the bladder and rectum is generally higher in the KBPPs, the doses still fall within clinical constraints. Among all the OARs, most of them received comparable results to the expert plan, except the cauda equina Dmax, which shows statistical significance and was lower in the KBPPs than in expert plans (48.5 +/- 0.06 Gy vs 49.3 +/- 0.05 Gy). The generated KBPPs were clinically comparable to manually crafted plans by expert treatment planners. The adaptive plan generation process was completed within an acceptable timeframe, offering a quick same -day adaptive treatment option. Our study supports the integration of KBP as a crucial component of an ART strategy, including maintaining plan consistency, improving quality, and enhancing efficiency. This advancement in speed and adaptability promises more precise treatment in proton ART. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of integrating knowledge-based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT
    Jayarathna, Sandun
    Shen, Xinglei
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Li, H. Harold
    Guida, Kenny
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (06):
  • [32] Novel in-house knowledge-based automated planning system for lung cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Shao, Yan
    Guo, Jindong
    Wang, Jiyong
    Huang, Ying
    Gan, Wutian
    Zhang, Xiaoying
    Wu, Ge
    Sun, Dong
    Gu, Yu
    Gu, Qingtao
    Yue, Ning Jeff
    Yang, Guanli
    Xie, Guotong
    Xu, Zhiyong
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2024, 200 (11) : 967 - 982
  • [33] Dose-painting intensity-modulated proton therapy for intermediate- and high-risk meningioma
    Madani, Indira
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Albertini, Francesca
    Trnkova, Petra
    Weber, Damien C.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [34] Assessment of daily dose accumulation for robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy treatment of prostate cancer
    Xu, Yihang
    Diwanji, Tejan
    Brovold, Nellie
    Butkus, Michael
    Padgett, Kyle R.
    Schmidt, Ryder M.
    King, Adam
    Dal Pra, Alan
    Abramowitz, Matt
    Pollack, Alan
    Dogan, Nesrin
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 81 : 77 - 85
  • [35] Multi-institution model (big model) versus single-institution model of knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for prostate cancer
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Kamima, Tatsuya
    Shimizu, Yumiko
    Muraki, Yuta
    Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
    Monzen, Hajime
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [36] Phase I Trial of Weekly Cabazitaxel with Concurrent Intensity Modulated Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Lin, Jianqing
    Den, Robert B.
    Greenspan, Jacob
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Hoffman-Censits, Jean H.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Hurwitz, Mark D.
    Leiby, Benjamin
    Dicker, Adam P.
    Kelly, W. Kevin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (05): : 939 - 947
  • [37] Online adaptive radiotherapy potentially reduces toxicity for high-risk prostate cancer treatment
    Christiansen, Rasmus Lubeck
    Dysager, Lars
    Hansen, Christian Ronn
    Jensen, Henrik Robenhagen
    Schytte, Tine
    Nyborg, Christina Junker
    Bertelsen, Anders Smedegaard
    Agergaard, Soren Nielsen
    Mahmood, Faisal
    Hansen, Steinbjorn
    Hansen, Olfred
    Brink, Carsten
    Bernchou, Uffe
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 167 : 165 - 171
  • [38] Evaluation of complexity and deliverability of prostate cancer treatment plans designed with a knowledge-based VMAT planning technique
    Wall, Phillip D. H.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [39] Proton versus photon therapy for high-risk prostate cancer with dose escalation of dominant intraprostatic lesions: a preliminary planning study
    Ong, Ashley Li Kuan
    Knight, Kellie
    Panettieri, Vanessa
    Dimmock, Mathew
    Tuan, Jeffrey Kit Loong
    Tan, Hong Qi
    Wright, Caroline
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [40] Multi-institutional evaluation of knowledge-based planning performance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer
    Kamima, Tatsuya
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    Shimizu, Yumiko
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Ishikawa, Kazuki
    Monzen, Hajime
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 64 : 174 - 181