Advancing knowledge-based intensity modulated proton planning for adaptive treatment of high-risk prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Johnson, Casey L. [1 ]
Hasan, Shaakir [1 ]
Huang, Sheng [1 ]
Lin, Haibo [1 ,2 ]
Gorovets, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Shim, Andy [1 ]
Apgar, Thomas [1 ]
Yu, Francis [1 ]
Tsai, Pingfang [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Proton Ctr, 225 East 126th St, New York, NY 10035 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Proton; Adaptive planning; High-risk prostate cancer; Intensity-modulated proton therapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; BLADDER; VOLUME; PLANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To assess the performance of a knowledge -based planning (KBP) model for generating intensitymodulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans as part of an adaptive radiotherapy (ART) strategy for patients with high -risk prostate cancer. A knowledge -based planning (KBP) model for proton adaptive treatment plan generation was developed based on thirty patient treatment plans utilizing RapidPlanTM PT (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The model was subsequently validated using an additional eleven patient cases. All patients in the study were administered a prescribed dose of 70.2 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicle (CTV70.2), along with 46.8 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes (CTV46.8) through simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. To assess the quality of the validation knowledge -based proton plans (KBPPs), target coverage and organ -at -risk (OAR) dose -volume constraints were compared against those of clinically used expert plans using paired t -tests. The KBP model training statistics ( R2 ) (mean +/- SD, 0.763 +/- 0.167, range, 0.406 to 0.907) and chi 2 values (1.162 +/- 0.0867, 1.039-1.253) indicate acceptable model training quality. Moreover, the average total treatment planning optimization and calculation time for adaptive plan generation is approximately 10 minutes. The CTV70.2 D98% for the KBPPs (mean +/- SD, 69.1 +/- 0.08 Gy) and expert plans (69.9 +/- 0.04 Gy) shows a significant difference ( p < 0.05) but are both within 1.1 Gy of the prescribed dose which is clinically acceptable. While the maximum dose for some organs -at -risk (OARs) such as the bladder and rectum is generally higher in the KBPPs, the doses still fall within clinical constraints. Among all the OARs, most of them received comparable results to the expert plan, except the cauda equina Dmax, which shows statistical significance and was lower in the KBPPs than in expert plans (48.5 +/- 0.06 Gy vs 49.3 +/- 0.05 Gy). The generated KBPPs were clinically comparable to manually crafted plans by expert treatment planners. The adaptive plan generation process was completed within an acceptable timeframe, offering a quick same -day adaptive treatment option. Our study supports the integration of KBP as a crucial component of an ART strategy, including maintaining plan consistency, improving quality, and enhancing efficiency. This advancement in speed and adaptability promises more precise treatment in proton ART. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Knowledge-Based Planning for Prostate Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy
    Xu, Yihang
    Brovold, Nellie
    Cyriac, Jonathan
    Bossart, Elizabeth
    Padgett, Kyle
    Butkus, Michael
    Diwanj, Tejan
    King, Adam
    Dal Pra, Alan
    Abramowitz, Matt
    Pollack, Alan
    Dogan, Nesrin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (02) : 62 - 72
  • [2] Knowledge-based intensity-modulated proton planning for gastroesophageal carcinoma
    Celik, Eren
    Baues, Christian
    Claus, Karina
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Marnitz, Simone
    Cozzi, Luca
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [3] Knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning for breast cancer
    Apaza Blanco, Oscar
    Almada, Maria
    Garcia Andino, Albin
    Zunino, Silvia
    Venencia, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 46 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [4] Impact of database quality in knowledge-based treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Wall, Phillip D. H.
    Carver, Robert L.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (06) : 437 - 444
  • [5] A treatment planning study of urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Yoshimura, Takaaki
    Nishioka, Kentaro
    Hashimoto, Takayuki
    Seki, Kazuya
    Kogame, Shouki
    Tanaka, Sodai
    Kanehira, Takahiro
    Tamura, Masaya
    Takao, Seishin
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Kobashi, Keiji
    Kato, Fumi
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 : 23 - 29
  • [6] Automated Knowledge-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Planning: An International Multicenter Benchmarking Study
    Delaney, Alexander R.
    Dong, Lei
    Mascia, Anthony
    Zou, Wei
    Zhang, Yongbin
    Yin, Lingshu
    Rosas, Sara
    Hrbacek, Jan
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Dahele, Max
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    CANCERS, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [7] A Knowledge-Based Approach to Improving and Homogenizing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Quality Among Treatment Centers: An Example Application to Prostate Cancer Planning
    Good, David
    Lo, Joseph
    Lee, W. Robert
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Das, Shiva K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01): : 176 - 181
  • [8] HYPOFRACTIONATED CONCOMITANT INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY BOOST FOR HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: LATE TOXICITY
    Quon, Harvey
    Cheung, Patrick C. F.
    Loblaw, D. Andrew
    Morton, Gerard
    Pang, Geordi
    Szumacher, Ewa
    Danjoux, Cyril
    Choo, Richard
    Thomas, Gillian
    Kiss, Alex
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Deabreu, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 898 - 905
  • [9] The Potential Role of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy in the Regional Nodal Irradiation of Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
    De Rose, F.
    Cozzi, L.
    Meattini, I
    Fogliata, A.
    Franceschini, D.
    Franzese, C.
    Tomatis, S.
    Becherini, C.
    Livi, L.
    Scorsetti, M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [10] Radical Prostatectomy as Primary Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Ingels, Alexandre
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 13 (02) : 179 - 186